Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NewRelic VS Charles Proxy

Compare NewRelic VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

NewRelic logo NewRelic

New Relic is a Software Analytics company that makes sense of billions of metrics across millions of apps. We help the people who build modern software understand the stories their data is trying to tell them.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • NewRelic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

NewRelic features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    New Relic provides a wide range of monitoring capabilities including application performance, infrastructure, and real user monitoring, offering a holistic view of your system's health.
  • Real-Time Data
    New Relic offers real-time analytics and insights, enabling quick identification and resolution of issues as they occur.
  • Advanced Alerting
    New Relic's advanced alerting system allows you to set customizable thresholds and get notified through various channels, helping to proactively manage potential issues.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform features an intuitive, user-friendly interface that makes it easy to navigate and visualize data, even for less experienced users.
  • Integration Capabilities
    New Relic integrates seamlessly with many other tools and platforms, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Scalability
    Whether you have a small startup or a large enterprise, New Relic scales easily with your growing needs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation and Support
    New Relic offers extensive documentation and a variety of support options including forums, customer support, and a vibrant community.

Possible disadvantages of NewRelic

  • Cost
    New Relic can be expensive, especially for smaller businesses or startups that may not have a large budget for monitoring tools.
  • Complexity
    While New Relic offers a lot of features, it can also be complex to set up and configure, requiring significant time and expertise.
  • Performance Impact
    In some cases, the agents and monitoring tools can add overhead to the monitored systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Data Storage Limits
    Lower-tier plans come with limits on data retention and storage, which may not be sufficient for some businesses with high data requirements.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The breadth of features and capabilities can result in a steep learning curve for new users, making it challenging to fully leverage the platform's potential quickly.

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Analysis of NewRelic

Overall verdict

  • Overall, NewRelic is regarded as a reliable and feature-rich APM solution. Its intuitive user interface, robust monitoring capabilities, and scalability generally receive positive feedback from users. However, it is essential to consider pricing and specific needs, as some users find it expensive compared to other solutions.

Why this product is good

  • NewRelic is considered a good choice for application performance monitoring (APM) because it offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time insights, and detailed analytics. It supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, and features like distributed tracing, error analytics, and infrastructure monitoring make it a versatile tool for ensuring application reliability and performance.

Recommended for

  • Development teams needing real-time application performance insights
  • Organizations looking to monitor complex distributed applications
  • Businesses that require comprehensive monitoring across different technology stacks
  • Teams focusing on optimizing application availability and performance

Analysis of Charles Proxy

Overall verdict

  • Charles Proxy is considered an excellent tool for those who need to monitor and analyze network communications. Its rich set of features and ease of use make it a valuable asset for developers and testers.

Why this product is good

  • Charles Proxy is widely regarded as a robust and versatile tool for web developers, offering comprehensive features for HTTP/HTTPS debugging, web traffic analysis, and SSL proxying. It provides a user-friendly interface, supports a wide array of platforms, and is especially useful for troubleshooting network issues and optimizing network calls.

Recommended for

  • Web Developers
  • Mobile App Developers
  • Network Engineers
  • QA Testers
  • Technical Support Teams

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NewRelic and Charles Proxy)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Performance Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NewRelic and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NewRelic and Charles Proxy

NewRelic Reviews

New Relic vs. Scout: Which Is The Right APM For You?
The top portion of the page is similar between New Relic and Scout: a breakdown of time spent by category (ex: Ruby, Database, External HTTP services, etc) over time. You can view data across similar timeframes in both Scout and New Relic (New Relic offers three months of data in their Pro package and Scout can do the same in their custom plans).
Source: scoutapm.com
Best New Relic Alternatives for Application Performance Monitoring (Cloud & SaaS)
Pingdom Server Monitor, which was formerly Scout Server Monitoring App which was acquired by Pingdom, has superior performance to New Relic, in particular when comparing response times, as seen in comparisons below. Ping Server Monitor comes ahead of New Relic in almost every single Response Time test and benchmark, beating it by almost 20x in terms of overhead.
10 Best Application Monitoring Tools for all Platforms
The NewRelic is a one of the best application performance management and monitoring software that gives you a deep analysis to the app stack. New Relic offers a real-time status checking of the app’s availability. It also gives email alerts and real-time notification.
Source: www.technig.com
Best DataDog Alternatives, Replacements & Competitors for Application & Log Monitoring
New Relic is an application/infrastructure performance management software designed for DevOps. The basic platform gives you real-time insights on the full stack of your cloud apps and infrastructure. New Relic can keep track of your apps whether is on-premises, on the cloud, or in hybrid environments.
Source: www.pcwdld.com
Top 15 Website Monitoring Tools
New Relic is very well known in the performance and developer community for providing a lot of different features and has been around since 2008. New Relic gives you deep performance analytics for every part of your software environment. You can easily view and analyze massive amounts of data, and gain actionable insights in real time. They do provide uptime alerts and...
Source: www.keycdn.com

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NewRelic seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 101 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NewRelic mentions (101)

View more

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NewRelic and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Zabbix - Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Dynatrace - Cloud-based quality testing, performance monitoring and analytics for mobile apps and websites. Get started with Keynote today!

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.