Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NetworkMiner VS Charles Proxy

Compare NetworkMiner VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

NetworkMiner logo NetworkMiner

NetworkMiner is a Network Forensic Analysis Tool (NFAT) for Windows.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • NetworkMiner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-14
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

NetworkMiner features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    NetworkMiner offers a clean and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible even for less experienced users.
  • Passive Network Sniffing
    The tool performs passive network sniffing, ensuring it does not add additional traffic or interfere with network operations.
  • Detailed Forensic Analysis
    NetworkMiner provides comprehensive forensic information, such as extracted files and IP information, aiding in detailed network traffic analysis.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    It supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility for users with different operating systems.
  • Free Edition Available
    NetworkMiner offers a free version with numerous features, making it accessible to users without budget constraints.

Possible disadvantages of NetworkMiner

  • Limited Advanced Features in Free Version
    While the free version offers many functionalities, some advanced features are restricted to the paid version (Professional Edition).
  • Resource Intensive
    NetworkMiner can consume significant CPU and memory resources, especially when analyzing large volumes of data.
  • No Real-Time Analysis
    The tool is designed for post-capture analysis, which means it does not provide real-time monitoring capabilities.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering advanced features and functionalities can require considerable learning time.
  • Dependency on Pcap Files
    NetworkMiner relies heavily on pcap files for analysis, requiring users to capture packets using another tool before importing them.

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

NetworkMiner videos

Introduction to NetworkMiner Network Packet Capture Parser

Charles Proxy videos

No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NetworkMiner and Charles Proxy)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Log Management
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NetworkMiner and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NetworkMiner and Charles Proxy

NetworkMiner Reviews

We have no reviews of NetworkMiner yet.
Be the first one to post

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NetworkMiner and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

tcpdump - tcpdump is a common packet analyzer that runs under the command line.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

SmartSniff - SmartSniff is a packet sniffer that capture TCP/IP packets and display them as sequence of conversations between clients and servers.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.