Nemo Reviews

mooSocial Reviews

1. Duncan Perry

   | Working at Semi Retired | about 3 years ago
   Cheap but unusable untl you buy the extras

   At first it seems Its cheaper than most of the competitors but without all the extra modules its very limited. With extra modules sometimes costing more than moosocial, the costs go into thousands of dollars very quickly. If you want to take Stripe as we do, thats extra. If you want a blog, thats extra. If you want to backup your data, thats extra if you want to have social media logins, thats extra. If you want the mobile apps thats extra.

   👍 Pros:    Cheap for basic moosocial

   👎 Cons:    Very expensive with the plug modules

Nemo mentions (8)

• Is there another file manager that works well with Gnome?

  Nemo worked well with GNOME 3, not sure about GNOME 4x. It is based on a very old version of nautilus. Source: over 1 year ago

• Using Nemo in Fedora 37

  For me is Nemo. Nemo is the file manager that Linux Mint maintains and uses by default in its desktop environment. It is a fork of Nautilus so is similar and migrating to it is painless. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• How its mtp implemented in nemo?

  I did some research about it and I find that nautilus uses a plugin called gvfs-mtp to get support mtp, so I think maybe that is the problem. I tried to read the code but I dont know to much of programming in C, then I ask myself how is that nemo handles mtp, and tried to search in the source code, I searched here https://github.com/linuxmint/nemo but couldn't find nothing so Im asking here because I dont know to... Source: over 1 year ago

• What beautiful Linux apps deserve more "marketing attention" for lack of a better term?

  Nemo Cinnamon's file manager, I love how customizable it is, even if it looks worse than Nautilus :(. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Are there alternatives to dolphin?

  Nemo Cinnamon filemanager...afraid no clue how well it works in other DEs. Source: over 2 years ago

mooSocial mentions (0)