Software Alternatives & Reviews

NATS VS HiveMQ

Compare NATS VS HiveMQ and see what are their differences

NATS logo NATS

NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

HiveMQ logo HiveMQ

HiveMQ is the MQTT based messaging platform for fast, efficient and reliable data movement to and from connected IoT devices and enterprise systems
  • NATS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05

NATS.io is a connective technology for distributed systems and is a perfect fit to connect devices, edge, cloud or hybrid deployments. True multi-tenancy makes NATS ideal for SaaS and self-healing and scaling technology allows for topology changes anytime with zero downtime.

  • HiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

NATS videos

The coolest OSS project you've never heard of: NATS Getting started!

HiveMQ videos

HiveMQ - Enabling the Connected Car

More videos:

  • Review - Webinar: What's New in HiveMQ 4.4?
  • Review - Webinar: Build Your Own HiveMQ Extension

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NATS and HiveMQ)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IoT Connectivity
0 0%
100% 100
Data Integration
45 45%
55% 55
App Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NATS and HiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NATS and HiveMQ

NATS Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
NATS is designed to be simple and easy to use, with a small footprint and low latency. It is often used in cloud-native environments to connect different components of a distributed system or to enable communication between microservices. NATS also supports message persistence, security, and clustering, making it a robust messaging system for building scalable and resilient...
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
One challenge of NATS is that it does not support reliable message queuing out of the box - messages can be lost if a client disconnects before it receives them. This can be mitigated by using NATS Streaming, a data streaming system powered by NATS, but it adds complexity.
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NATS is known for its high performance, low latency, and emphasis on simplicity after it was rewritten in Go. Its rewrite in Go makes NATS an ideal choice for demanding and real-time applications and has increased its throughput compared to its original Ruby implementation.
Source: gcore.com

HiveMQ Reviews

We have no reviews of HiveMQ yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NATS seems to be a lot more popular than HiveMQ. While we know about 63 links to NATS, we've tracked only 3 mentions of HiveMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NATS mentions (63)

  • Implementing OTel Trace Context Propagation Through Message Brokers with Go
    Several message brokers, such as NATS and database queues, are not supported by OpenTelemetry (OTel) SDKs. This article will guide you on how to use context propagation explicitly with these message queues. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • NATS: First Impressions
    Https://nats.io/ (Tracker removed) > Connective Technology for Adaptive Edge & Distributed Systems > An Introduction to NATS - The first screencast I guess I don't need to know what it is. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Sequential and parallel execution of long-running shell commands
    Pueue dumps the state of the queue to the disk as JSON every time the state changes, so when you have a lot of queued jobs this results in considerable disk io. I actually changed it to compress the state file via zstd which helped quite a bit but then eventually just moved on to running NATS [1] locally. [1] https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Interview with Sebastian Holstein, Founder of Qaze
    During our interview, we referred to NATS quite a few times! If you want to learn more about it, Sebastian suggests this tutorial series. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Revolutionizing Real-Time Alerts with AI, NATs and Streamlit
    Imagine you have an AI-powered personal alerting chat assistant that interacts using up-to-date data. Whether it's a big move in the stock market that affects your investments, any significant change on your shared SharePoint documents, or discounts on Amazon you were waiting for, the application is designed to keep you informed and alert you about any significant changes based on the criteria you set in advance... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

HiveMQ mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NATS and HiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

EMQX - EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.