Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NativeBase VS MIT App Inventor

Compare NativeBase VS MIT App Inventor and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

NativeBase logo NativeBase

Experience the awesomeness of React Native without the pain

MIT App Inventor logo MIT App Inventor

App Inventor is a cloud-based tool, which means you can create apps for phones or tablets right in your web browser.
  • NativeBase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19
  • MIT App Inventor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

NativeBase features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    NativeBase offers components that work seamlessly across both iOS and Android, ensuring a consistent user experience across different devices.
  • Rich Component Library
    Provides a vast collection of pre-built UI components, such as buttons, forms, navigations, and more, significantly speeding up the development process.
  • Customization
    Highly customizable themes and components that allow you to match the look and feel of your app to specific design requirements.
  • Community Support
    Active community and extensive documentation make it easier to find solutions to common problems and get support from fellow developers.
  • Integration with React Native
    Designed to work specifically with React Native, offering better integration and performance compared to more generalized component libraries.
  • Accessible Design
    Offers components and practices aimed at making apps more accessible, which is crucial for creating inclusive applications.

Possible disadvantages of NativeBase

  • Learning Curve
    Can have a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with React Native or component-based design.
  • Performance Overhead
    May introduce some performance overhead due to the abstraction layers, which might not be suitable for performance-critical applications.
  • Dependency Management
    Frequent updates and changes in the library can lead to dependency issues that require regular maintenance and updates.
  • Limited Advanced Customization
    While basic customization is easy, deeply customizing components to fit unique use cases can be challenging and may require additional effort.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on any proprietary framework or library can make it difficult to switch technologies in the future, constraining flexibility.
  • Size
    The library can add to the overall size of the application, which might be a concern for apps where minimizing the footprint is crucial.

MIT App Inventor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    MIT App Inventor offers a drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible for beginners and non-programmers to create mobile applications without writing code.
  • Educational Value
    The platform is designed to teach the fundamentals of programming and computational thinking, which makes it an excellent tool for educators and students.
  • Cloud-Based
    Projects are stored in the cloud, allowing users to access their work from any device with internet connectivity.
  • Extensive Resources
    A wealth of tutorials, guides, and community forums are available to help users learn and troubleshoot.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The platform enables quick development and testing of app prototypes, which is useful for iterative design processes.
  • Real-Time Testing
    Real-time testing on connected devices speeds up the development cycle by providing immediate feedback.

Possible disadvantages of MIT App Inventor

  • Limited Functionality
    Advanced features and custom functionality can be difficult or impossible to implement due to the platform's limitations.
  • Performance Issues
    Apps created with MIT App Inventor may not be as optimized or performant as those developed with more complex programming environments.
  • Dependency on Internet
    Since it is a cloud-based tool, a stable internet connection is required to access services, which might be a constraint in some situations.
  • Basic User Interface Design
    The drag-and-drop interface may lead to less polished or professional UI/UX compared to apps designed with dedicated design tools.
  • Limited Platform Support
    Primarily supports Android development, which might be a downside for those looking to develop iOS applications.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Apps
    While it is user-friendly for simple applications, creating more complex apps can still require a significant amount of learning and problem-solving.

NativeBase videos

NativeBase Market Purchase Flow

MIT App Inventor videos

MIT App Inventor: Mobile Apps. Built by You.

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to Send Data to a Google Sheet with MIT App Inventor
  • Review - Thunkable Vs AppyBuilder Vs Makroid Vs MIT App Inventor ||difference||
  • Tutorial - Create First App in MIT App Inventor 2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NativeBase and MIT App Inventor)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
29 29%
71% 71
Application Builder
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NativeBase and MIT App Inventor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NativeBase and MIT App Inventor

NativeBase Reviews

We have no reviews of NativeBase yet.
Be the first one to post

MIT App Inventor Reviews

Top 10 Android Studio Alternatives For App Development
MIT App Inventor is a visual programming environment which is developed by Google. It allows users to build apps for tablets and smartphones.
Top 5 App Builder To Build Your Own App Without Coding
Undoubtedly, Kodular has been the best app builder in recent years. It was founded on 6 July 2017 by the partnership of 7 people such as Conor shipp, Vishwas Adiga, Pavitra Golchha, Sander Jochems, Sivagiri Visakan, and Diego Barreiro. It is a Builder based on the MIT App inventor. You can make your apps on this platform without any charges. Everything is 100% free in this...
THE BEST 34 APP DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE IN 2022 LIST
AppInventor.org is a site for learning and teaching how to program mobile apps with MIT’s App Inventor. These tutorials are refined versions of the tutorials that have been on the Google and MIT App Inventor sites from App Inventor’s inception– thousands of beginners have used them to learn programming and learn App Inventor.
Best Mobile App Development Tools for Kids
MIT App Inventor is a web application integrated development environment originally provided by Google and now maintained by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It allows newcomers to computer programming to create application software(apps) for two operating systems (OS): Android, and iOS. It is free and open-source software released under dual licensing.
Source: codinghero.ai
10 Best Android Studio Alternatives For App Development
Thunkable is a powerful drag and drops app builder. And this is made by two of the very first MIT engineers on the MIT app inventor. The platform is geared for the most professional users, who may want higher quality and robust apps for their business, community or just for themselves. Thus, Thunkable has an amazingly active and engaged community. And it also offers live...
Source: techdator.net

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MIT App Inventor should be more popular than NativeBase. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NativeBase mentions (22)

  • Exploring the Best UI Component Libraries for React Native apps
    Gluestack, like any other customizable UI library, is built to make styling less cumbersome. It comprises a set of themed and unstyled components easily integrated across different platforms and devices. Originally, Gluestack was a part of NativeBase, a component library for both React and React Native. With performance and maintainability in mind, NativeBase was split into two parts, focusing on a universal... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Best headless UI libraries in React Native
    Just like the other libraries mentioned in this article, Gluestack is another unstyled component library. Originally a part of NativeBase, the developer team created this library to prevent bloat and enhance maintainability of the project. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • An Overview of 25+ UI Component Libraries in 2023
    KumaUI : Another relatively new contender, Kuma uses zero runtime CSS-in-JS to create headless UI components which allows a lot of flexibility. It was heavily inspired by other zero runtime CSS-in-JS solutions such as PandaCSS, Vanilla Extract, and Linaria, as well as by Styled System, ChakraUI, and Native Base. ### Vue. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 7 Popular React Native UI Component Libraries You Should Know
    NativeBase is a collection of essential cross-platform React Native components. The components are built with React Native combined with some JavaScript functionality with customizable properties. NativeBase is fully open-source and has 18,000+ stars on GitHub. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • React vs React Native: How Different Are They, Really?
    CSS-based UI libs don't make sense on mobile; your new options include NativeBase, React Native Elements and others). Some web-based UI libs do have RN siblings though - such as React Native Material and React Native Paper (for Material-UI), and tailwind-rn (for Tailwind). This just means new decisions to make, some learning, and new paradigms for how to use the new libs. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

MIT App Inventor mentions (41)

  • Awesome-no-code-tools
    App Inventor - Create powerful Android apps without code using blocs coding. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Looking for savable graphing methods
    First thought, play with MIT App Inventor https://appinventor.mit.edu/, they have dedicated blocks for graphing and cross-platform implementations of Bluetooth for Android and iOS. The data format is still up to you. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • App for recording time periods
    Or you could go to https://appinventor.mit.edu/ and design your own custom app (no widget, though). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Easiest code to learn to make an app?
    If you want to make a mobile app you could try https://appinventor.mit.edu/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Trying to have a Ubuntu server I can turn on from my phone, log in as user, and start the Docker containers for my server. How do I automate this process?
    Maybe a raspberry pi that's on 24/7 connected to wifi and use that to send the wake over lan signal to the server? Arduino on the power pins also works, I did something quite similar but with a Bluetooth board, the code was really simple I just made an Android app with MIT app inventor that sent a signal to the hc_05 bt board, once the Arduino received that signal it shorted the power pin to 5v for half a second... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NativeBase and MIT App Inventor, you can also consider the following products

React Native Desktop - Build OS X desktop apps using React Native

Thunkable - Powerful but easy to use, drag-and-drop mobile app builder.

React Native UI Kitten - Customizable and reusable react-native component kit

Kodular - Much more than a modern app creator without coding

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Android Studio - Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA