NANO VS Neutral

NANO mentions (133)

• Crypto Had Its Chance

  Nano has been around for years now, instant, feeless transfers. Its useful, but nobody is using it. It gets spam attacked every bull run as well which suggests certain influences dont want it to ever take off. https://nano.org/en. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• [Winner's Thread # 86] Restored Faith in Humanity! Thank you!

  Hi /u/oroscor1! Congratulations! Can you make a Nano (https://nano.org/en) wallet so I can send you some coin? By using Nano we can avoid the high transaction fees of BitCoin and PayPal. Source: over 1 year ago

• Can a 51% attack allow attackers to “steal the identity” of a wallet and spoof the sender of a transaction?

  Nano’s network is validated through a Open Representative Voting (ORV) consensus mechanism. They have fallen victim to a 51% attack in the last and attackers were able to double spend funds. Is it possible for this same attack to allow the sender address of a transaction to be spoofed? Source: over 1 year ago

• ELI5: Why wouldn’t a universal currency work?

  There’s a better decentralised digital currency now called Nano that aims to be a borderless, permissionless currency for the unbanked masses. Source: over 1 year ago

• NANO: A Complete Project Overview

  Nano is a blockchain with an acyclic structure and, thus, high throughput. Developer Colin LeMahieu launched the project in 2014, and it was initially called RaiBlocks, but in 2018 it became NANO. The project's main goal was to initiate a massive adoption of NANO everywhere as a paying method without using smart contracts and dApps built upon them. The team wanted to get rid of other blockchains' drawbacks. Source: almost 2 years ago

Neutral mentions (0)