Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Nagios VS Apache ZooKeeper

Compare Nagios VS Apache ZooKeeper and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Nagios logo Nagios

Complete monitoring and alerting for servers, switches, applications, and services

Apache ZooKeeper logo Apache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.
  • Nagios Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • Apache ZooKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21

Nagios features and specs

  • Extensive Community Support
    Nagios has a large and active user community, which means you can easily find help and resources online. There are numerous plugins and add-ons developed by the community that can extend the functionality of Nagios.
  • Highly Customizable
    Nagios is highly customizable and flexible. It allows you to tailor monitoring to suit your specific needs, including creating custom plugins, modifying configuration files, and integrating with other tools.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    Nagios provides detailed monitoring of network services, host resources, and infrastructure systems. This includes the ability to monitor CPU load, disk usage, memory, and more.
  • Alerting and Notification
    Nagios has robust alerting and notification features that ensure you can stay informed of any issues or downtime. Alerts can be sent via email, SMS, or other communication channels.
  • Scalable
    Nagios is scalable and can grow with your organization. It supports a large number of hosts and services, making it suitable for both small and large enterprises.

Possible disadvantages of Nagios

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Nagios can be quite complex to set up and configure, especially for newcomers. The learning curve is steep, requiring time and effort to fully understand and utilize its capabilities.
  • Manual Configuration
    A significant amount of configuration is manual, particularly in the open-source version. This can be time-consuming and prone to human error, especially in larger environments.
  • Interface
    The user interface of Nagios is often considered outdated and less intuitive compared to other modern monitoring tools. The web interface can be difficult to navigate and is not as visually appealing.
  • Performance Issues
    Nagios can experience performance issues, particularly when monitoring a large number of hosts and services. It can become resource-intensive, requiring careful optimization and tuning.
  • Cost of Enterprise Version
    The enterprise version of Nagios, Nagios XI, comes with a significant cost. While it offers additional features, support, and a more user-friendly interface, it might not be affordable for all organizations.

Apache ZooKeeper features and specs

  • High Availability
    ZooKeeper is designed to be highly available, with built-in redundancy and failover mechanisms that ensure minimal downtime.
  • Consistency
    It follows a strict consistency model, ensuring that reads reflect the most recent writes, which is crucial for coordination and configuration management.
  • Scalability
    ZooKeeper can handle a high number of read operations and can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the ensemble.
  • Leader Election
    ZooKeeper simplifies the implementation of leader election processes, making it easier to design fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Cluster Management
    It aids in cluster management by providing mechanisms to track the status and configuration of nodes across a distributed system.
  • Watch Mechanism
    ZooKeeper provides a watch mechanism that allows clients to be notified of data changes, helping to keep state synchronized across systems.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ZooKeeper

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a ZooKeeper ensemble can be complex, requiring careful configuration and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    ZooKeeper can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU, especially in large deployments.
  • Write Performance
    While read operations are very fast, write operations can be slower due to the need to achieve consensus among ZooKeeper nodes.
  • Operational Overhead
    Managing ZooKeeper involves operational overhead, including monitoring, backups, and handling node failures.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    Although ZooKeeper supports many major languages, the client libraries for some languages may not be as mature or well-supported as those for others.
  • Transaction Size
    ZooKeeper is not designed for very large data or complex transactions, limiting its use cases to lightweight coordination tasks.

Analysis of Nagios

Overall verdict

  • Nagios is generally considered a good tool, especially for users who require a highly customizable and adaptable monitoring solution. It is reliable and well-established in the IT industry.

Why this product is good

  • Nagios is considered a robust monitoring tool due to its flexibility, comprehensive network and application monitoring capabilities, and wide adoption in the industry. It allows system administrators to monitor critical infrastructure components, such as network protocols, applications, services, servers, and network infrastructure. Its active community and plugin ecosystem provide extensive customization options.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with complex IT environments needing comprehensive monitoring
  • System administrators who require flexibility and customization
  • Users who are comfortable with manual configurations and open-source solutions
  • Companies seeking a large community and a wealth of plugins for various use cases

Analysis of Apache ZooKeeper

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Apache ZooKeeper is considered a good choice for scenarios involving distributed system coordination, thanks to its proven track record, robust performance, and active community support.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ZooKeeper is highly regarded for its reliability, simplicity, and efficiency as a centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. It is widely used for coordinating distributed systems and streamlining complex operations across multiple nodes, due to its strong consistency guarantees and leader-election capabilities.

Recommended for

  • Distributed applications needing coordination and synchronization
  • Systems requiring leader election
  • Applications that benefit from centralized metadata management
  • Frameworks like Hadoop, Kafka, and HBase which use ZooKeeper for coordination tasks

Nagios videos

+ Add

Stop using Nagios - Andy Sykes

More videos:

  • Review - Bernd Erk - Why favour Icinga over Nagios
  • Review - How Nagios XI Works

Apache ZooKeeper videos

+ Add

Why do we use Apache Zookeeper?

More videos:

  • Review - 4.5. Apache Zookeeper | Hands-On - Getting Started

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Nagios and Apache ZooKeeper)

Nagios

Apache ZooKeeper

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100
Log Management
100 100%
Log Management
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Nagios and Apache ZooKeeper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Nagios and Apache ZooKeeper

Nagios Reviews

11 Best Nagios Alternatives (Free & Open Source) in 2024
Nagios is an open source network monitoring solution. It helps organizations to identify and resolve IT infrastructure issues. However, Nagios could be difficult integrate into automatic provisioning processes. There are few other issues with Nagios as well. Here, is a curated list of top tools that can replace Nagios. This list consists of paid as well as open-source...
Source: www.guru99.com
The Best Nagios Alternatives for Server, Application and Network Monitoring
Nagios is a very strong system monitoring package but its ability to compete in both the free and paid system monitoring market is frequently challenged. The free tool is very comprehensive. However, the Nagios team has taken away the traffic analysis functions from this, moving them off into a separate paid tool, which puts Nagios Core at a disadvantage when compared to...
Source: www.websentra.com
The 10 Best Nagios Alternatives in 2024 (Paid and Open-source)
It’s also important to note that Nagios is completely open-source, which means that it’s free to use. However, “free to use” doesn’t mean that it won’t cost you anything. Often, the reason users look for alternatives to tools like Nagios is because of their open-source nature. Self-hosting a tool of this magnitude can be even more expensive than purchasing a SaaS subscription.
Source: betterstack.com
The Best Cacti Monitoring Alternatives
Nagios is free for small environments with seven or fewer nodes and hosts. Its paid version starts at $1995 for the license and is priced per user. There is also a variety of free training options for Nagios available online. Both of Nagios’ paid versions include a free trial.
Source: www.webservertalk.com
10 Best Linux Monitoring Tools and Software to Improve Server Performance [2022 Comparison]
Nagios Core is an open-source Linux/Unix systems monitoring and alerting tool that can be extended through custom plugins, providing flexible Linux server monitoring. It remotely executes different plugins (executables or scripts) on your Linux server using the NRPE (Nagios Remote Plugin Executor) add-on, which gives you comprehensive monitoring data, including OS metrics,...
Source: sematext.com

Apache ZooKeeper Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache ZooKeeper yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ZooKeeper seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nagios mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Nagios yet. Tracking of Nagios recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache ZooKeeper mentions (32)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nagios and Apache ZooKeeper, you can also consider the following products

Zabbix - Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

NewRelic - New Relic is a Software Analytics company that makes sense of billions of metrics across millions of apps. We help the people who build modern software understand the stories their data is trying to tell them.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Loading...