MyBATIS

Website

mybatis.org

$ Details

-

Categories

#Development #Tool #Web Frameworks #MySQL Tools

gRPC

Website

grpc.io

$ Details

Categories

#Web Servers #Web And Application Servers #Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy #Developer Tools

MyBATIS features and specs

• Simplicity
  MyBatis is easier to use compared to other ORM tools because it provides a simple and direct approach to database interaction using XML or annotations, making it accessible for developers familiar with SQL.
• Flexibility in SQL
  It allows for complete control over SQL queries, enabling developers to write complex queries and use full SQL syntax without constraints, unlike automated ORM solutions.
• Performance
  Since developers have direct control over SQL statements, the performance can be optimized for specific use cases, potentially reducing the overhead that automated ORM solutions might introduce.
• Mapping
  Offers robust and customizable mapping capabilities between database tables and Java classes, helping in clearly defining how data should be transformed between the system and the data layer.
• Lazy Loading
  Supports lazy loading of related objects, which can improve performance by delaying the fetching of data until it is specifically needed.

Possible disadvantages of MyBATIS

• Manual SQL Management
  The need to manually write and maintain SQL can be cumbersome and error-prone, especially for complex applications with large numbers of queries.
• Lack of Automated Associations
  MyBatis does not inherently manage relationships between entities like some other ORM tools, which requires developers to handle association mappings themselves.
• Limited Abstraction
  Compared to full ORM frameworks, MyBatis offers less abstraction over the database layer, which means developers must handle more of the database logic manually.
• Learning Curve for XML
  While not steep, there is a learning curve involved in configuring MyBatis using XML for those who are more accustomed to purely annotation-driven configuration or other ORM tools.
• Reduced Portability
  Because SQL is database-specific, MyBatis applications might become less portable across different database platforms when relying extensively on custom SQL.

gRPC features and specs

• Performance
  gRPC uses Protocol Buffers, which are more efficient in terms of serialization and deserialization compared to text-based formats like JSON. This leads to lower CPU usage and faster transmission, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
• Bi-directional Streaming
  gRPC supports bi-directional streaming, enabling both client and server to send a series of messages through a single connection. This is particularly useful for real-time communication applications.
• Strongly Typed APIs
  gRPC uses Protocol Buffers for defining service methods and message types, providing a strong type system that can catch potential issues at compile-time rather than runtime.
• Cross-language Support
  gRPC supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C++, Python, Go, and C#. This allows for flexible integration in polyglot environments.
• Built-in Deadlines/Timeouts
  gRPC natively supports deadlines and timeouts to help manage long-running calls and avoid indefinite blocking, improving robustness and reliability.
• Automatic Code Generation
  gRPC provides tools for automatic code generation from .proto files, reducing boilerplate code and speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages of gRPC

• Learning Curve
  The complexity of gRPC and Protocol Buffers may present a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these technologies.
• Limited Browser Support
  gRPC was not originally designed with browser support in mind, making it challenging to directly call gRPC services from web applications without additional tools like gRPC-Web.
• Verbose Configuration
  Setting up gRPC and defining .proto files can be more verbose compared to simpler RESTful APIs, which might be a deterrent for smaller projects.
• HTTP/2 Requirement
  gRPC relies on HTTP/2 for transport, which can be problematic in environments where HTTP/2 is not supported or requires additional configuration.
• Limited Monitoring and Debugging Tools
  Compared to REST, there are fewer tools available for monitoring, debugging, and testing gRPC services, which might complicate troubleshooting and performance tuning.
• Protobuf Ecosystem Requirement
  Depending on the language, integrating Protocol Buffers might require additional dependencies and tooling, which could add to the maintenance overhead.

Screencast #18: Introduction to mybatis

More videos:

gRPC, Protobufs and Go... OH MY! An introduction to building client/server systems with gRPC

More videos: