Mux VS Opencast

Compare Mux VS Opencast and see what are their differences

craftlands.host

Powerful, fast, and budget-friendly game server hosting for Minecraft, Rust and more. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Opencast

Opencast is an open source solution for automated video capture and distribution at scale.

Landing page //
2023-04-23

Landing page //
2021-12-19

Mux

Website: mux.com
Pricing URL: Official Mux Pricing
$ Details: freemium
Release Date: 2015 January
Startup details
Country: United States
State: California
City: San Francisco
Employees: 100 - 249

Edit details

Opencast

Website: opencast.org
Pricing URL: -
$ Details: -
Release Date: -

Edit details

Mux features and specs

High-Quality Streaming
Mux provides superior video quality with adaptive bitrate streaming, ensuring optimal viewer experience across different devices and network conditions.
Scalability
Mux's infrastructure is built to handle a vast number of concurrent streams efficiently, making it suitable for both small startups and large enterprises.
Developer-Friendly API
Mux offers an intuitive and well-documented API which makes it easy for developers to integrate and manage video functionality within their applications.
Real-Time Analytics
Mux provides comprehensive real-time analytics that give insights into viewer engagement, performance metrics, and other critical data, aiding in decision-making.
Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Mux leverages global CDNs to ensure fast and reliable content delivery regardless of the viewer’s location.

Opencast features and specs

Open Source
Opencast is an open-source project, allowing organizations to use, modify, and distribute the software without licensing costs, leading to potentially significant savings and the ability to tailor the software to specific needs.
Community Support
Being open-source, Opencast has a community of developers and users who contribute to its development and offer support, which can be valuable for troubleshooting and improving the platform.
Scalability
Opencast is designed to be scalable, making it suitable for institutions of different sizes, from small educational organizations to large universities with extensive multimedia requirements.
Feature-Rich
Opencast provides a wide range of features tailored for lecture capture and video management, including scheduling, recording, processing, and distribution of media content.
Integration Capabilities
It offers integration with other educational technologies and platforms, such as Learning Management Systems (LMS), enhancing its usability in academic settings.

Possible disadvantages of Opencast

Complex Setup
Setting up Opencast can be complex and may require technical expertise, which might be a barrier for institutions without sufficient IT resources.
Limited Documentation
While there is documentation available, some users may find it insufficient or challenging to navigate, which can hinder the ability to maximize the platform's potential.
Resource Intensive
The system can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial server infrastructure to manage and distribute large volumes of video content efficiently.
Community Reliance
Though community support can be an advantage, reliance on it means that urgent issues might not be resolved as quickly as with commercial software with dedicated support.
Customization Challenges
While the flexibility of an open-source platform allows for customization, it can also present challenges due to the complexity of making changes to the codebase, especially for those lacking in-depth technical knowledge.

Mux videos

No Mux videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Opencast videos

+ Add

Opencast Releases Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mux and Opencast)

Opencast

Video Streaming

100 100%

Video Streaming

0% 0

Video

53 53%

Video

47% 47

Video Platform

63 63%

Video Platform

37% 37

Video Converter

0 0%

Video Converter

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mux and Opencast. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mux seems to be a lot more popular than Opencast. While we know about 32 links to Mux, we've tracked only 1 mention of Opencast. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mux mentions (32)

Video site with 800GB of >512MB videos and 900GB Cloudfront bandwidth costs too much ($800/mo). Cloudflare? R2?
How are you storing/serving the videos? You might look at a service like mux.com which both hosts files behind a CDN but optimizes video delivery with adaptive bitrate streaming. If you are serving whole/raw video files off Cloudfront that could impact your costs. Source: almost 2 years ago
Low cost live stream providers? My clients always request facebook, but as I branch out, I'd like to be able to offer something that looks more professional.
Vimeo is a solid platform. Most alternatives you'll find searching for "vimeo vs." are just marketing / billing wrappers around the mux.com streaming platform. If you are somewhat technically inclined you can use mux.com directly and embed it on your website yourself. Source: about 2 years ago
Curtain pulled back: Cover pdf on business methodology, growth opportunities and strategies into the future.
Feels like there's no real alternative to Youtube since they have large enough capital to run the site to be barely able to break even. Feels like something like https://mux.com would meet the purpose jut feels like free streaming is way too costly. Source: about 2 years ago
Need help with building a CEA/CTA-708 closed captions encoder for MPEG-TS video streams
The repo is unmaintained, ever since Matt moved from Twitch to mux.com, so the library does need a maintainer. There are some bugs and PRs that could do with merging to head, but it is generally functional, with some quirks. The code is used in both OBS and Gstreamer Rust bindings. Source: over 2 years ago
I built Senja, a tool to collect testimonials and turn them into marketing material with Sveltekit.
So Senja uses Mux under the hood for video storage and streaming. It's an amazing solution! Source: over 2 years ago

Opencast mentions (1)

Ask HN: What is the most impactful thing you've ever built?
Setting up an automated lecture capture system at my university, based around the open-source https://opencast.org software. We did everything from buying hardware components to build machines that were specifically tuned to encode videos on the fly with the least space/noise possible to be put into lecture halls, writing the software to run on that, to running the video management system with opencast,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mux and Opencast, you can also consider the following products

Castr - Castr.io allows streamers to stream to multiple streaming platforms simultaneously!

Kaltura - Video solutions for media, service providers, enterprises, and education - OTT TV, Webcasting, Enterprise YouTube, VPaaS – live and VOD.

api.video - Add video to your product in minutes

Panopto - Panopto is the leading online video platform for businesses and universities. Easily create, host, search, share, and stream videos across your organization.

Vimeo - Vimeo is a social media app that lets you share and capture videos. You can watch new videos in a variety of different categories, and you can share your own content right from your device. Read more about Vimeo.

Brightcove - | The Leading Online Video Platform |

api.video vs Opencast