Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mux VS Every Second

Compare Mux VS Every Second and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Mux logo Mux

Video infrastructure for the internet

Every Second logo Every Second

Realtime stats per second of Apple and YouTube
  • Mux Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-23
  • Every Second Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-27

Mux

Website
mux.com
$ Details
freemium
Release Date
2015 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
California
Employees
100 - 249

Every Second

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Release Date
-

Mux features and specs

  • High-Quality Streaming
    Mux provides superior video quality with adaptive bitrate streaming, ensuring optimal viewer experience across different devices and network conditions.
  • Scalability
    Mux's infrastructure is built to handle a vast number of concurrent streams efficiently, making it suitable for both small startups and large enterprises.
  • Developer-Friendly API
    Mux offers an intuitive and well-documented API which makes it easy for developers to integrate and manage video functionality within their applications.
  • Real-Time Analytics
    Mux provides comprehensive real-time analytics that give insights into viewer engagement, performance metrics, and other critical data, aiding in decision-making.
  • Content Delivery Network (CDN)
    Mux leverages global CDNs to ensure fast and reliable content delivery regardless of the viewer’s location.

Every Second features and specs

  • Intuitive Interface
    Every Second offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users of varying technical skills to navigate and use the platform efficiently.
  • Real-Time Updates
    The platform provides real-time updates and metrics, allowing users to make informed decisions based on the most current data available.
  • Customizability
    Every Second allows for personalized dashboards and reports, enabling users to adapt the tool to their specific needs and preferences.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to be scalable, accommodating growing data volumes and user bases without significant drops in performance.

Possible disadvantages of Every Second

  • Cost
    For some users, the pricing model of Every Second might be a concern, particularly for small businesses or individual users with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is intuitive, new users may still encounter a learning curve when trying to understand the full range of features and capabilities.
  • Limited Integrations
    Every Second may have limited integration options with other software and platforms, potentially affecting its usability within certain tech stacks.
  • Reliance on Internet
    As a cloud-based tool, consistent internet access is required for real-time data access, which might be a drawback in areas with unreliable connectivity.

Analysis of Mux

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Mux is considered to be a good choice for businesses and developers looking to embed video functionality into their applications. Its robust infrastructure, reliability, and comprehensive toolkit make it a preferred solution in the industry.

Why this product is good

  • Mux is a renowned provider for video streaming infrastructure which is particularly appreciated for its ease of use, scalability, and extensive API support. Its platform allows developers to easily integrate video functionalities into applications without needing in-depth video expertise. Mux offers a wide range of features such as adaptive bitrate streaming, video encoding, live streaming, and analytics, making it suitable for various video-related needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers wanting to integrate video content into web or mobile applications
  • Businesses needing scalable live streaming solutions
  • Organizations requiring detailed video analytics to understand viewer engagement
  • Startups looking for a reliable and easy-to-use video infrastructure

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mux and Every Second)
Video Streaming
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Video Platform
100 100%
0% 0
Analytics
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mux and Every Second. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mux seems to be a lot more popular than Every Second. While we know about 32 links to Mux, we've tracked only 1 mention of Every Second. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mux mentions (32)

  • Video site with 800GB of >512MB videos and 900GB Cloudfront bandwidth costs too much ($800/mo). Cloudflare? R2?
    How are you storing/serving the videos? You might look at a service like mux.com which both hosts files behind a CDN but optimizes video delivery with adaptive bitrate streaming. If you are serving whole/raw video files off Cloudfront that could impact your costs. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Low cost live stream providers? My clients always request facebook, but as I branch out, I'd like to be able to offer something that looks more professional.
    Vimeo is a solid platform. Most alternatives you'll find searching for "vimeo vs." are just marketing / billing wrappers around the mux.com streaming platform. If you are somewhat technically inclined you can use mux.com directly and embed it on your website yourself. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Curtain pulled back: Cover pdf on business methodology, growth opportunities and strategies into the future.
    Feels like there's no real alternative to Youtube since they have large enough capital to run the site to be barely able to break even. Feels like something like https://mux.com would meet the purpose jut feels like free streaming is way too costly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Need help with building a CEA/CTA-708 closed captions encoder for MPEG-TS video streams
    The repo is unmaintained, ever since Matt moved from Twitch to mux.com, so the library does need a maintainer. There are some bugs and PRs that could do with merging to head, but it is generally functional, with some quirks. The code is used in both OBS and Gstreamer Rust bindings. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I built Senja, a tool to collect testimonials and turn them into marketing material with Sveltekit.
    So Senja uses Mux under the hood for video storage and streaming. It's an amazing solution! Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Every Second mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mux and Every Second, you can also consider the following products

Castr - Castr.io allows streamers to stream to multiple streaming platforms simultaneously!

ViralStat - All-in-one tool for cross-platform social video analytics

api.video - Add video to your product in minutes

Brunhilde - Analyze YouTube comments to know what your audience thinks

Vimeo - Vimeo is a social media app that lets you share and capture videos. You can watch new videos in a variety of different categories, and you can share your own content right from your device. Read more about Vimeo.

You-Get - Command-line utility to download media contents from the web