Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mutt VS Sendmail

Compare Mutt VS Sendmail and see what are their differences

Mutt logo Mutt

Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based mail client for Unix operating systems.

Sendmail logo Sendmail

Sendmail is a general purpose internetwork email routing facility that supports many kinds of...
  • Mutt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-14
  • Sendmail Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-11

Mutt features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Mutt is a small but powerful email client which uses very few system resources. This makes it particularly suitable for older machines or environments where memory and processing power are at a premium.
  • Highly Configurable
    Mutt can be extensively customized to suit the needs of the user, including features like custom key bindings, macros, and hooks. This flexibility allows power users to tailor their email setup exactly to their preferences.
  • Fast
    Due to its minimalistic design, Mutt is very fast and responsive. It can handle large mail folders with ease, making it ideal for users who need to manage many emails efficiently.
  • Secure
    Mutt supports GPG and PGP for email encryption, ensuring that it can be used to send and receive secure messages.
  • Extensive Protocol Support
    Mutt supports various email protocols including POP3, IMAP, and SMTP, allowing users to access and send emails from different types of accounts.
  • Scriptable
    Mutt can be extended with scripts and external commands which can further enhance its functionality and allow for automation of various tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Mutt

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Mutt requires a significant amount of setup and configuration, and its text-based interface may be intimidating for new users who are accustomed to graphical email clients.
  • Lack of Graphical Interface
    As a text-based email client, Mutt does not offer a graphical interface, which may be a drawback for users who prefer visual navigation and management of their emails.
  • Limited HTML Support
    Mutt has limited support for rendering HTML emails, which can be inconvenient when receiving richly formatted messages.
  • Manual Configuration Required
    Users must manually edit configuration files to set up and customize Mutt, which can be time-consuming and complex, especially for those unfamiliar with the process.
  • No Built-in Calendar Integration
    Unlike some modern email clients, Mutt does not include built-in calendar or task management features, which may necessitate using additional tools for these functions.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Certain functionalities in Mutt rely on external tools (e.g., for handling attachments or fetching mail), which can increase the complexity of the setup and maintenance.

Sendmail features and specs

  • Established Reputation
    Sendmail has been in operation since the early days of email, providing a solid foundation and reliability in Unix-based email systems. Its long-standing presence indicates a mature and well-understood system.
  • Highly Configurable
    Sendmail offers extensive configuration options, allowing administrators to customize their setup to accommodate complex email routing and handling requirements.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source software, Sendmail offers transparency in its operations, enabling community contributions and adaptations to specific needs without licensing costs.
  • Wide Compatibility
    Sendmail is compatible with a variety of email standards and protocols, which facilitates integration with different email systems and services.

Possible disadvantages of Sendmail

  • Complex Configuration
    The extensive configurability of Sendmail comes at the cost of a steep learning curve; its configuration files are complex and can be challenging for beginners.
  • Security Concerns
    Historically, Sendmail has had several vulnerabilities, partly due to its complexity and pervasive use. It requires diligent updates and security management.
  • Less User-Friendly
    Compared to more modern solutions, Sendmail lacks a user-friendly interface, making it harder for less technically inclined users to manage and configure.
  • Performance Limitations
    Sendmail can be less efficient than some modern mail transfer agents in terms of resource usage and performance, especially in high-volume environments.

Analysis of Mutt

Overall verdict

  • Mutt is generally considered an excellent choice for users comfortable with command-line interfaces and those who prioritize speed, customization, and flexibility in their email clients. However, it may not be suitable for users who prefer graphical interfaces or require extensive support for modern email features like calendar integration or HTML rendering.

Why this product is good

  • Mutt is a well-regarded open-source text-based email client known for its speed, customizable features, and powerful handling of large volumes of emails. It is particularly appreciated by users who prefer working in a terminal environment and require a high degree of control over their email management, including scripting and keyboard shortcuts.

Recommended for

  • Technical users who prefer a command-line interface
  • Individuals managing large volumes of email
  • Users who appreciate customizable and scriptable tools
  • Linux and Unix enthusiasts

Mutt videos

Mutt Motorcycle Australian review

More videos:

  • Review - Mmmmmm... MUTT Hilts Motorcycle - What am I missing? Ride-on Review
  • Review - 2018 Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 250 Review - A bigger Mutt with a 250cc engine!

Sendmail videos

breve configuracion de sendmail

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mutt and Sendmail)
Email
64 64%
36% 36
Email Clients
68 68%
32% 32
SMTP Server
0 0%
100% 100
Email Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Mutt and Sendmail. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sendmail seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mutt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Mutt yet. Tracking of Mutt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sendmail mentions (1)

  • Sendmail and Exchange online - 550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
    We are using sendmail and Exchange online with to different identies. We are experience problem that we want to receive Teams invitation to our @ sendmail.com address, when I forward teams invitation fromexchange online identite to "sendemail" identetie we are getting error. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mutt and Sendmail, you can also consider the following products

Mailspring - Mailspring is a mail client for Mac, Windows and Linux.

Postfix - Postfix is a mail transfer agent (MTA) that routes and delivers electronic mail.

Geary - Geary is an email application built for GNOME 3.

Exim - Exim is a message transfer agent (MTA) developed at the University of Cambridge for use on Unix systems connected to the Internet.

The Bat - The Bat! is a secure desktop email client for Windows, designed to protect your correspondence against third-parties and to save your time.

sSMTP - sSMTP is a simple MTA to deliver mail from a computer to a mail server.