Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mustache.js VS Pugjs

Compare Mustache.js VS Pugjs and see what are their differences

Mustache.js logo Mustache.js

Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Pugjs logo Pugjs

Pugjs is an online platform that manages programming in the best way with powerful tools.
  • Mustache.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • Pugjs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10

Mustache.js features and specs

  • Logic-less Templates
    Mustache.js enforces a logic-less approach to templating, which helps in maintaining separation of concerns by ensuring that templates only concern themselves with presentation and not business logic.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Mustache.js is a JavaScript implementation of the Mustache templating language, which is supported across multiple platforms and languages, making it highly versatile and easy to integrate with various projects.
  • Lightweight
    Mustache.js is a lightweight library with a small footprint, which leads to faster loading times and reduced performance overhead compared to heavier templating engines.
  • Easy to Learn
    The syntax of Mustache is minimalistic and resembles regular HTML, making it easy to learn and adopt, especially for developers familiar with HTML.
  • Prevents Complexity
    By being logic-less, Mustache.js discourages embedding complex logic in templates, which can lead to cleaner and more maintainable codebases.

Possible disadvantages of Mustache.js

  • Limited Logic Handling
    While the logic-less nature of Mustache.js encourages separation of concerns, it can be limiting for developers who need to embed complex logic in their templates, requiring workarounds or supplementary handling in JavaScript.
  • Performance Issues with Large Data
    Mustache.js may encounter performance bottlenecks when rendering large data sets, as the library processes templates and data at runtime.
  • No Built-in Helpers
    Unlike some other templating engines, Mustache.js does not support helpers or custom logic extensions, which can make common tasks cumbersome or require additional code.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Mustache.js lacks some advanced features found in other templating engines, such as conditionals and loops within templates, which can limit its functionality for complex applications.
  • Dependency on External Logic
    Because Mustache.js relies heavily on external data processing, it may lead to scattered business logic across the application that might be difficult to manage as the project grows.

Pugjs features and specs

  • Clean Syntax
    PugJS offers a clean and minimal syntax that reduces the amount of HTML you have to write. This means less boilerplate and a more readable code, enhancing developer productivity.
  • Whitespace Significance
    The syntax of PugJS eliminates the need for closing tags, which simplifies the code structure and makes the document easier to maintain.
  • Template Inheritance
    PugJS provides powerful template inheritance features, allowing developers to extend and reuse templates easily, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Conditional Rendering and Iteration
    PugJS supports conditional statements and loops, allowing developers to render content dynamically within templates, which is particularly useful for complex applications.
  • Integration with Node.js
    PugJS is efficiently integrated with Node.js, making it an excellent choice for server-side rendering in JavaScript applications.

Possible disadvantages of Pugjs

  • Learning Curve
    The unique syntax of PugJS can be difficult to grasp for beginners or those accustomed to traditional HTML, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Whitespace Sensitivity
    While the whitespace-sensitive syntax reduces clutter, it can lead to syntax errors if not managed carefully, as indentation plays a critical role in the template structure.
  • Limited Browser-Side Usage
    PugJS is primarily designed for server-side usage, meaning it has limited direct application in client-side JavaScript without additional tooling.
  • Less Popular for Front-End Development
    Compared to JSX or plain HTML, PugJS is less commonly used for front-end development, which can result in fewer community resources or plugins.
  • Conversion Needed for HTML
    PugJS templates need to be compiled into HTML before they can be used in a webpage, which adds a step to the development process unless automated.

Mustache.js videos

Getting started with Mustache.js

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript and JSON tutorial: JavaScript templating with mustache.js | lynda.com

Pugjs videos

No Pugjs videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mustache.js and Pugjs)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Development
44 44%
56% 56
Localization
0 0%
100% 100
Frontend Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Mustache.js and Pugjs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pugjs should be more popular than Mustache.js. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mustache.js mentions (12)

  • Documenting my pin collection with Segment Anything: Part 3
    Mustache.js: This is a templating engine used for rendering templates on the web. In your application, Mustache.js is used to dynamically create HTML forms based on the data received from the server, such as image cutouts and identifiers. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • NakedJSX - Use JSX without React
    JSX just a templating language in this case, right? No reactivity at all? What's the benefit against using something like https://github.com/janl/mustache.js/ ? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Im not sure if im asking the right question here, but how do you create separate pages on a website?
    Nonetheless, I made ridiculous simple MRE(minimal reproducible example) for you: Https://codesandbox.io/s/distracted-gauss-gqfiue You might quickly realize the annoyance of html as strings, move to some template then, e.g: https://handlebarsjs.com/guide/ Also this example uses a library for the routing matching. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Managing application cache with react-query, and code generation.
    Mustache.js is a template engine for creating js templates. Cosmiconfig is a tool to make it convenient to work with the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • After an eternity, java.com has updated its homepage
    For a small page like that, they are using Oracle content management, knockoutjs, RedwoodJs, MarkedJs, MustacheJs, JQuery and Bootstrap. There's like 10+ layers or div, header and nav elements just to display the logo. They can't even properly anchor the footer at the bottom... Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Pugjs mentions (31)

  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • htmx and ExpressJS
    It is a novel experience to say the least for me. I mean yes I have been using Handlebars, pug, and other templating engines but this is novel in how it changed my perspective about HTML (Just read their motivation in htmx.org). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Use Go's HTML/template to write React-like code
    I've been using Go's html/template for the last couple of months and all I can say is that it's still very much a toy. It's fine for basic loops and conditionals but anything beyond that is extremely limited and having proper reusable components is a constant fight against limitations, specifically because of the lack of being able to pass multiple arguments to a template. I wish the Go team had gone with... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Writing HTML by Hand
    I hate writing HTML. Yes, there's IDE support for inserting s but it's just annoying. Same for lists of classes or attributes etc. For everyone else feeling like me: Try pug (formerly jade) or rather it's CLI variant pug-cli. You can reuse stuff and even have JS in it to iterate through stuff or give it parameters while still feeling pretty vanilla. https://pugjs.org/api/getting-started.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mustache.js and Pugjs, you can also consider the following products

EJS - An open source JavaScript Template library.

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax

Localazy - Forget all the hassle and make your app available in 80+ languages with the translation platform built for app developers.

FLAVE - Flave was created to bring ASP.

Weglot - Translate your website instantly, no code required

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...