Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform VS NSQ

Compare MuleSoft Anypoint Platform VS NSQ and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform logo MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Anypoint Platform is a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.
  • MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform videos

+ Add

Introduction to MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

NSQ videos

+ Add

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and NSQ)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

NSQ

API Tools
100 100%
API Tools
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100
Web Service Automation
94 94%
Web Service Automation
6% 6
Data Integration
93 93%
Data Integration
7% 7

User comments

Share your experience with using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and NSQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and NSQ

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Reviews

Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Connectivity Simplified: Its ability to simplify connectivity is at the heart of the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform. Anypoint Platform provides a unified integration framework, allowing for effortless connection and communication between various endpoints. This means quicker access to critical data, reduced silos, and a more agile business environment.
Source: www.zluri.com
6 Best Mulesoft Alternatives & Competitors For Data Integration [New]
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform combines automation, integration, and API management in a single platform. This iPaaS solution offers out-of-the-box connectors, pre-built integration templates, and a drag-and-drop design environment. Utilizing an API-led approach to connectivity, it integrates different systems, applications, data warehouses, etc., both on-premise and in the...
Source: www.dckap.com

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NSQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform yet. Tracking of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform recommendations started around Mar 2021.

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and NSQ, you can also consider the following products

Boomi - The #1 Integration Cloud - Build Integrations anytime, anywhere with no coding required using Dell Boomi's industry leading iPaaS platform.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Loading...