Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Mounty for NTFS VS Ceph

Compare Mounty for NTFS VS Ceph and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Mounty for NTFS logo Mounty for NTFS

A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

Ceph logo Ceph

Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...
  • Mounty for NTFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-23
  • Ceph Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-16

Mounty for NTFS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Mounty for NTFS is easy to use with a minimalistic interface that allows users to mount NTFS drives with a single click.
  • Freeware
    Mounty is available for free, making it accessible for anyone needing to write to NTFS drives on Mac.
  • No Additional Drivers Required
    The application utilizes Apple's native NTFS support, which eliminates the need for third-party drivers.
  • Lightweight
    Being a simple utility, Mounty for NTFS is lightweight and does not consume a lot of system resources.

Possible disadvantages of Mounty for NTFS

  • Limited Features
    Mounty offers basic functionality, lacking advanced features that other paid solutions might provide, such as file repair or diagnostic tools.
  • Performance
    Since it relies on Apple's native NTFS support, write speeds might be slower compared to other software that uses custom drivers.
  • Stability
    Users have reported occasional stability issues or mounts failing, which might cause inconvenience during critical tasks.
  • Compatibility
    While Mounty supports most macOS versions, compatibility with the latest OS updates can sometimes lag.

Ceph features and specs

  • Scalability
    Ceph is designed to scale horizontally by adding more nodes. This allows for seamless expansion of storage capacity as needs grow.
  • High Availability
    Ceph provides high availability and fault tolerance through its distributed architecture and data replication methods, ensuring data is always accessible.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Ceph has a large community of developers and users which help in rapid identification and rectification of issues. It also offers lower cost of ownership compared to proprietary solutions.
  • Versatility
    Ceph supports block storage, object storage, and file systems within the same cluster, providing great flexibility and reducing the need for multiple storage solutions.
  • Performance
    Ceph delivers high performance, particularly for large-scale deployments, by balancing loads and efficiently distributing data.

Possible disadvantages of Ceph

  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining a Ceph cluster can be complex and requires skilled administrators, which might not be suitable for smaller organizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    Ceph can be resource-heavy, demanding significant CPU, memory, and network resources, which can be a limitation for smaller setups.
  • Documentation
    Despite a rich set of features, Ceph’s documentation can sometimes be lacking or difficult for new users to comprehend, potentially leading to longer learning curves.
  • Hardware Requirements
    Ceph typically requires high-quality, enterprise-grade hardware to achieve optimal performance and reliability, which can entail a higher upfront investment.
  • Operational Overhead
    Day-to-day management, monitoring, and troubleshooting of Ceph clusters require a specialized skill set, leading to possible increases in operational overhead.

Mounty for NTFS videos

No Mounty for NTFS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Ceph videos

+ Add

UDS 2013-03: Ceph Review - Part 1/2

More videos:

  • Review - Designing for High Performance Ceph at Scale
  • Review - RHCS 4 Cockpit Ceph Installer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mounty for NTFS and Ceph)

Mounty for NTFS

Ceph

Storage
18 18%
Storage
82% 82
Cloud Storage
13 13%
Cloud Storage
87% 87
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Cloud Computing
5 5%
Cloud Computing
95% 95

User comments

Share your experience with using Mounty for NTFS and Ceph. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mounty for NTFS and Ceph

Mounty for NTFS Reviews

We have no reviews of Mounty for NTFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Ceph Reviews

Simplyblock as alternative to Ceph: A Comprehensive Comparison
Ceph utilizes its own storage driver (rbd) that is integrated into the Linux Kernel and can also be used on other platforms as a third-party driver. It enables seamless connectivity between hosts and the Ceph cluster. In addition to OpenStack, Ceph offers deep integrations with Kubernetes through a separate CSI driver, as well as other platforms.
Source: www.simplyblock.io
Best & Cheapest Object Storage Providers With S-3 Support
The libraries of Ceph support applications built in Java, C, C++, PHP, Python, and other languages. It also gives these apps access to its object storage platform via a native API.
Source: macpost.net
What are the alternatives to S3?
Ceph is a software-defined storage platform that implements object storage. Its interface is built with the same storage system that provides the librados interface, making it have the same abilities as librados like read-only snapshot and revert to snapshot. The software delivers Object, File, and Block storage in a single, unified system. Ceph is S3 compatible, and its...
Source: www.w6d.io
Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
Open-Source software platforms are not free but you can use them as community edition or with limited features. The above storage platforms have same goals but also have some different abilities and capabilities, so choosing or using them is depended to your requirements and budget. About Ceph, I think that Ceph is still the best and there is no limitation for community...
Source: www.teimouri.net
15 FreeNAS Alternatives 2020 | Best Storage Operating System
PetaSAN is a Ceph-based iSCSI cluster, open-source FreeNAS alternative, known widely for its end-to-end integrated solution and scale-out SAN arrangement that offers impressive adaptability and execution. Its latest cloud storage technology makes it corporate-efficient to manage large data storage in one unit; run on the Linux operating system, the program has many nodes...
Source: solutionsuggest.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ceph seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mounty for NTFS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Mounty for NTFS yet. Tracking of Mounty for NTFS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ceph mentions (11)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Ceph stands out in storage technology, offering a scalable and reliable solution where traditional systems fall short. It supports object, block, and file storage in one system, adaptable for various environments including on-premises, cloud, or container-native setups. Key benefits include scalability, enabled by the CRUSH algorithm, allowing for expansion without typical downtime. This makes Ceph suitable for... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • iSCSI over WAN / backup of remote site
    With that being said, you better take a look at something more WAN optimized and more secure, like S3 storage. You can build the S3 storage (and gain immutability) using something like MinIO (https://min.io/) or Ceph (https://ceph.io/en/) or check out Object First Ootbi offerings - https://objectfirst.com/object-storage/ (I work for them). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What's the best AWS S3 protocol alternative?
    I believe Ceph [1] could be a good alternative. It can be self hosted and I believe some cloud providers also offer it. Here are some differences between S3 and Ceph [2]. [1] - https://ceph.io/en/ [2] - https://www.lightbitslabs.com/blog/ceph-storage/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Seeking Advice & Opinions: Hybrid NAS/Cloud Storage for Family Use
    Another option is a distributed Ceph cluster https://ceph.io/en/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • First Time NAS buyer for Digital Textile Printing Factory
    There's also cool systems like https://ceph.io/en/ that could be efficient if willing to set up and learn. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mounty for NTFS and Ceph, you can also consider the following products

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

iBoysoft NTFS for Mac - Free download iBoysoft NTFS for Mac to read, write, mount, format NTFS drives on Mac and transfer files to NTFS drives on macOS Sonoma, macOS Ventura, macOS Monterey, macOS Big Sur, macOS Catalina, macOS Mojave, and macOS High Sierra.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

OSXFUSE - FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...

StorPool - StorPool is designed from the ground up to provide cloud builders, shared hosting providers and MSPs with the most resource efficient storage software on the market.

Loading...