Software Alternatives & Reviews

MooseFS VS LizardFS

Compare MooseFS VS LizardFS and see what are their differences

MooseFS logo MooseFS

MooseFS is a fault tolerant, network distributed file system.

LizardFS logo LizardFS

LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system.
  • MooseFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24
  • LizardFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

MooseFS videos

A look at MooseFS and LizardFS distributed file systems

More videos:

  • Review - MooseFS – Distributed File System – Overview

LizardFS videos

A look at MooseFS and LizardFS distributed file systems

More videos:

  • Review - LizardFS Intro
  • Tutorial - LizardFS and OpenNebula, a petabyte cloud the simple way How to move OpenNebula into the Petabyte s…

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MooseFS and LizardFS)
Cloud Storage
54 54%
46% 46
Storage
49 49%
51% 51
Cloud Computing
46 46%
54% 54
File Sharing
79 79%
21% 21

User comments

Share your experience with using MooseFS and LizardFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MooseFS and LizardFS

MooseFS Reviews

We have no reviews of MooseFS yet.
Be the first one to post

LizardFS Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
LizardFS, Software Defined Storage is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant, and highly available file system. It allows combining disk space located on several servers into a single namespace visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. LizardFS was inspired by the GoogleFS distributed file system that was introduced in 2010.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MooseFS should be more popular than LizardFS. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MooseFS mentions (2)

  • Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
    MooseFS is designed for large files and can have a global goal of 1 copy (no replication) https://moosefs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Can someone tell me if this is possible or even a good idea?
    My friends and I all use Linux and often use each others laptops or desktops when we forget ours. Then I had the idea to install Linux on a USB so I could have all my stuff and use my system on any system. Which was cool but then I ran into the same problem of forgetting it sometimes. So my new idea (which I have no idea how I'd achieve) is to use something like MooseFS or ceph or some distributed filesystem for... Source: almost 3 years ago

LizardFS mentions (1)

  • Had to add a second sata card and upgrade to a 1600 watt power supply because spinning up 17 drives was too much for my poor 900 watt...
    That's a lotta eggs to put in one basket. I started using LizardFS for mass storage and it basically allows me to grow/shrink easily. https://lizardfs.com/. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MooseFS and LizardFS, you can also consider the following products

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Seaweed FS - SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system to store and serve billions of files fast! SeaweedFS object store has O(1) disk seek and SeaweedFS Filer supports cross-cluster replication, POSIX, S3 API, ,…

OSXFUSE - FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...