Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

monotone VS CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

Compare monotone VS CVS (Concurrent Versions System) and see what are their differences

monotone logo monotone

monotone is a free distributed version control system.

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) logo CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

CVS is a centralized version control system, an important component of Source Configuration...
  • monotone Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • CVS (Concurrent Versions System) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-23

monotone features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) features and specs

  • Wide Adoption and Mature
    CVS has been around for a long time, making it a mature version control system with a large user base. This means extensive documentation and community support are available.
  • Simplicity
    CVS is relatively simple to use, which makes it suitable for projects that do not require complex version control features.
  • Compatibility
    CVS is compatible with many legacy systems and can be easily integrated into older development workflows.
  • Client-Server Architecture
    CVS supports a client-server architecture, which allows for collaborative development across different teams and geographical locations.

Possible disadvantages of CVS (Concurrent Versions System)

  • Lack of Atomic Operations
    CVS does not support atomic commits, which means partial commits can occur if a commit process is interrupted, potentially leading to inconsistent repository states.
  • Poor Support for Renames and Moves
    CVS does not handle renaming or moving files efficiently, as it requires manual interventions to maintain the history of files.
  • Single Branch Development
    CVS has limited support for branch management, which can complicate the development of larger projects where robust branching strategies are required.
  • Limited Merge Capabilities
    Merging in CVS can be challenging due to its less sophisticated merge support compared to modern version control systems.
  • Lack of Security Features
    CVS has fewer built-in security features, which may not meet the needs of projects requiring stringent access control and encryption.

monotone videos

monotone phone review

More videos:

  • Review - Poker Millionaire Reveals His Strategy on Monotone Flops (ft. Kanu7)

CVS (Concurrent Versions System) videos

No CVS (Concurrent Versions System) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to monotone and CVS (Concurrent Versions System))
Git
42 42%
58% 58
Code Collaboration
42 42%
58% 58
Git Tools
42 42%
58% 58
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using monotone and CVS (Concurrent Versions System). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing monotone and CVS (Concurrent Versions System), you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Azure DevOps - Visual Studio dev tools & services make app development easy for any platform & language. Try our Mac & Windows code editor, IDE, or Azure DevOps for free.

Apache Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Git for Windows - We bring the awesome Git SCM to Windows