Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Monkey Test It VS FitNesse

Compare Monkey Test It VS FitNesse and see what are their differences

Monkey Test It logo Monkey Test It

Primate powered algorithms that scan your site for common bugs and SEO mistakes.

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.
  • Monkey Test It Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-04

Monkey Test It is the only way to summon a troop of specially bred fully automated website testing monkeys to your website. These tests check for all the most commonly overlooked mistakes, including JavaScript errors, missing files (images, css, etc), broken links, and SEO issues. Don't waste time clicking around the web-inspector whenever you deploy your website, let our monkeys do the hard work.

  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Monkey Test It and FitNesse)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Automated Testing
66 66%
34% 34
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Monkey Test It and FitNesse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Monkey Test It mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Monkey Test It yet. Tracking of Monkey Test It recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Monkey Test It and FitNesse, you can also consider the following products

Simple Analytics - The privacy-first Google Analytics alternative located in Europe.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

BugBug.io - BugBug makes test automation ultra-simple. It allows you to automate testing without coding, ensuring the quality of your web app or website without repetitive manual testing or writing a line of code.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Hyperping - Cheap uptime and performance monitoring with detailed reporting and flexible alerting

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.