Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Monitor ML VS BrowserStack

Compare Monitor ML VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Mixo
AI-powered website builder that helps you create professional sites in minutes featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Monitor ML logo Monitor ML

Real-time production monitoring of ML models, made simple.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Monitor ML Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

Monitor ML

Website
monitorml.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

Monitor ML features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    Monitor ML offers a wide range of monitoring features that can track various metrics and performance indicators of machine learning models, helping users identify and address potential issues quickly.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with an intuitive user interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise to navigate and utilize effectively.
  • Automated Alerts
    Monitor ML provides automated alert systems that notify users of anomalies or significant changes in model performance, allowing for proactive management and intervention.
  • Scalability
    The service is scalable, meaning that it can accommodate the needs of both small-scale and large-scale machine learning projects, making it a versatile option for different business sizes.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Monitor ML easily integrates with popular machine learning frameworks and tools, facilitating seamless implementation into existing workflows and systems.

Possible disadvantages of Monitor ML

  • Cost
    Depending on the features and scale, Monitor ML can be expensive, potentially making it less accessible for smaller companies or projects with limited budgets.
  • Complex Configuration
    While the interface is user-friendly, setting up and configuring the monitoring system to fit specific needs can be complex and time-consuming for inexperienced users.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users might find the customization options limited, especially for highly specific monitoring needs that may not be fully supported by the platform's existing features.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    As with many third-party platforms, there may be concerns about data privacy and security, particularly when dealing with sensitive or proprietary data.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on an external service for monitoring can lead to potential issues if the service experiences downtime or technical difficulties.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

Monitor ML videos

No Monitor ML videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Monitor ML and BrowserStack)

Monitor ML

BrowserStack

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
AI
100 100%
AI
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Monitor ML and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Monitor ML and BrowserStack

Monitor ML Reviews

We have no reviews of Monitor ML yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Monitor ML mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Monitor ML yet. Tracking of Monitor ML recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BrowserStack mentions (8)

  • Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma
    This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 15 days ago
  • 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness
    Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Monitor ML and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

TensorFlow - TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning framework designed and published by Google. It tracks data flow graphs over time. Nodes in the data flow graphs represent machine learning algorithms. Read more about TensorFlow.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

TensorFlow Lite - Low-latency inference of on-device ML models

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

mlblocks - A no-code Machine Learning solution. Made by teenagers.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loading...