Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MongoDB VS IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compare MongoDB VS IBM Cloud Object Storage and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MongoDB logo MongoDB

MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.
  • MongoDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

MongoDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    MongoDB offers horizontal scaling through sharding, allowing it to handle large volumes of data and enabling distributed computing.
  • Flexible Schema
    It allows for a flexible schema design using BSON (Binary JSON), making it easier to iterate and change application data models.
  • High Performance
    MongoDB is optimized for read and write throughput, making it suitable for real-time applications.
  • Rich Query Language
    Supports a rich and expressive query language that allows for efficient querying and analytics.
  • Built-in Replication
    Provides robust replication mechanisms for high availability and redundancy.
  • Geospatial Indexing
    Offers powerful geospatial indexing capabilities, useful for location-based applications.
  • Aggregation Framework
    Enables complex data manipulations and transformations using the aggregation pipeline framework.
  • Cross-Platform
    Works on multiple operating systems, enhancing its versatility and deployment options.

Possible disadvantages of MongoDB

  • Memory Usage
    MongoDB can consume a large amount of memory due to its use of memory-mapped files, which may be a concern for some applications.
  • Complex Transactions
    While MongoDB supports ACID transactions, they can be more complex to implement and less efficient compared to traditional relational databases.
  • Data Redundancy
    The flexible schema design can lead to data redundancy and increased storage costs if not managed carefully.
  • Limited Joins
    Joins are supported but can be less efficient and more limited compared to relational databases, affecting complex relational data querying.
  • Indexing Overhead
    Extensive indexing can introduce overhead and impact performance, especially during write operations.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires a different mindset and understanding compared to traditional relational databases, which can present a learning curve for new users.
  • Lacks Mature Analytical Tools
    The ecosystem for analytical tools around MongoDB is not as mature as those for traditional relational databases, which might limit advanced analytics capabilities.
  • Cost
    The cost of using MongoDB's cloud services (MongoDB Atlas) can be high, especially for large-scale deployments.

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

MongoDB videos

+ Add

MySQL vs MongoDB

More videos:

  • Review - The Good and Bad of MongoDB
  • Review - what is mongoDB

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

+ Add

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MongoDB and IBM Cloud Object Storage)

MongoDB

IBM Cloud Object Storage

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MongoDB and IBM Cloud Object Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MongoDB and IBM Cloud Object Storage

MongoDB Reviews

10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
MongoDB’s superpower lies in its flexibility. Its document-based model lets you store data in a free-form, schema-less way, making it adaptable to evolving application needs. Need to add a new field or change the structure of your data? No problem, MongoDB handles it with ease.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
MongoDB Realm provides a robust alternative to Firebase, especially for apps requiring a flexible data model. Key features include:
Source: signoz.io
Announcing FerretDB 1.0 GA - a truly Open Source MongoDB alternative
MongoDB is no longer open source. We want to bring MongoDB database workloads back to its open source roots. We are enabling PostgreSQL and other database backends to run MongoDB workloads, retaining the opportunities provided by the existing ecosystem around MongoDB.
Source: blog.ferretdb.io
16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
The database added a new feature to its list of attributes called MongoDB Atlas. It is a global cloud database technology that allows to deploy a fully managed MongoDB across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure with its built-in automation for resource, workload optimization and to reduce the time required to handle the database.
Source: www.analytixlabs.co.in
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
MongoDB is an open source NoSQL DBMS which uses a document-oriented database model. It supports various forms of data. However, in MongoDB data consumption is high due to de-normalization.
Source: www.guru99.com

IBM Cloud Object Storage Reviews

We have no reviews of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MongoDB seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MongoDB mentions (18)

  • Creating AI Memories using Rig & MongoDB
    In this article, we’ll build a CLI tool using the Rig AI framework and MongoDB for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This tool will store summarized conversations in a database and retrieve them when needed, enabling the AI to maintain context over time. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Adventures of Blink S2e2: Database, Contained
    Have a Mongo database holding the various phrases we're going to use and potentially configuration data for the frontend as well. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Introducing Perseid: The Product-oriented JS framework
    It's also worth mentioning that Perseid provides out-of-the-box support for React, VueJS, Svelte, MongoDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Express and Fastify. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • DocumentDB Elastic Cluster Pricing
    Does anyone know if the most basic Elastic Cluster instance of DocumentDB carries any monthly fixed cost or is it just on-demand cost? Another words if I run like 10,000 queries against the DB per month, what kind of bill would I expect? This is for a super small app. I am currently using mongodb free tier , but want to migrate everything to AWS. Can't seem to find a straight answer to the pricing question. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I wrote some scripts for converting the UTZOO Usenet archive to a Mongo Database
    You can use either MongoDB.com's dashboard (if you host a remote database) or Mongo Compass to run queries on the data or you can modify the express middleware with your own queries. I'm still working on the API, so it's not very robust yet. I will update this when it is. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

IBM Cloud Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet. Tracking of IBM Cloud Object Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MongoDB and IBM Cloud Object Storage, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

Loading...