Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MongoDB Compass VS GlusterFS

Compare MongoDB Compass VS GlusterFS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

MongoDB Compass logo MongoDB Compass

The easiest way to explore and manipulate your MongoDB data

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
  • MongoDB Compass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-05

The GUI for MongoDB. Visually explore your data. Run ad hoc queries in seconds. Interact with your data with full CRUD functionality. View and optimize your query performance. Available on Linux, Mac, or Windows. Compass empowers you to make smarter decisions about indexing, document validation, and more.

  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10

MongoDB Compass features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    MongoDB Compass provides a graphical user interface that is intuitive and easy to navigate, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users to manage MongoDB data efficiently.
  • Schema Visualization
    Compass allows users to visualize and explore their database schemas, which helps in understanding data structures and relationships without needing to know MongoDB's query language.
  • Real-time Performance Analysis
    It offers real-time insights into query performance, allowing users to identify and optimize slow-running queries effectively.
  • Aggregation Pipeline Builder
    The aggregation pipeline builder provides a user-friendly way to build complex aggregation queries with easier debugging and visualization of stages.
  • Built-in Validation
    Compass includes features to validate document structure and schemas against predefined rules, helping maintain data integrity and consistency.
  • Data Exploration
    Users can easily browse data, with filters, projections, and other query capabilities built right into the interface, making it easy to find and explore specific documents.

Possible disadvantages of MongoDB Compass

  • Resource Intensive
    MongoDB Compass can be resource-heavy and may require significant memory and processing power, which could be problematic for users with limited system resources.
  • Limited for Large Datasets
    While Compass is great for small to medium-sized data sets, it might struggle to efficiently display or process very large data sets due to performance limitations.
  • Limited Functionality
    Although Compass provides plenty of tools for data management, it does not offer the full range of features available through MongoDB's command-line interface or other more programmable options.
  • Not Suitable for Production Use
    Compass is generally more suited for development or administrative tasks and not recommended for production environments where command-line tools may be more reliable.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users still need to learn how to use Compass effectively, especially those unfamiliar with MongoDB concepts.

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

MongoDB Compass videos

No MongoDB Compass videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MongoDB Compass and GlusterFS)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Database Management
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MongoDB Compass and GlusterFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MongoDB Compass mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MongoDB Compass yet. Tracking of MongoDB Compass recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MongoDB Compass and GlusterFS, you can also consider the following products

Studio 3T - The perfect match for your MongoDB team

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Robo 3T - Robo 3T is a tool for managing your MongoDB installation. Robo 3T is a rebranding of the tool formerly known as Robomongo.

rkt - App Container runtime

mongo-express - Web-based MongoDB admin interface written with Node.js, Express and Bootstrap3

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.