Monaco Editor VS Open Science Framework

Fyi, if you are ever looking for a fun project you might be able to implement this. The vscode editor source is available as a library https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

VScode uses the monaco-editor to display all editor screens in vscode including the markdown editor. A simple solution is to use the in built markdown file editor and call it a day. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

So lets say the project consists of two packages Lib and App in which Lib is a library and App is the frontend app which depends on Lib. Now I want to display a monaco powered code editor in App which has has access to all types of Lib. This means that I have to somehow read the *.d.ts file of Lib as a string to set it as "extra lib" for monaco. Source: 6 months ago

You’ll see a Monaco Editor-powered change editor. The content incoming from the Git repo is on the left, while the current content in Vrite is on the right. You can make changes in the editor on the right - this will ultimately become the result content. Once you’re done, click Resolve. If there are no other conflicts, you should now be able to pull the latest changes. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

By referencing the ProseMirror docs, forwarding the editor state back and forth, and adjusting the layout, I managed to integrate Monaco Editor — the web editor extracted from VS Code — together with Prettier (for code formatting) right into the Vrite Editor (I know, that’s a lot of editors in one place 😅). - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: 11 months ago

Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: 11 months ago