Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MLton VS CodeSignal

Compare MLton VS CodeSignal and see what are their differences

Remote.com
Were creating a new standard in global HR, enabling every business to access better payroll, tax, benefits and compliance solutions. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MLton logo MLton

MLton is an open-source, whole-program, optimizing Standard ML compiler

CodeSignal logo CodeSignal

CodeSignal is the leading assessment platform for technical hiring.
  • MLton Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-25
  • CodeSignal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-12

MLton features and specs

  • Performance
    MLton is known for producing highly optimized, efficient executables due to its whole-program compilation approach. This can result in faster performance compared to other Standard ML compilers.
  • Standard ML Compliance
    MLton has strong adherence to the Standard ML language specification, ensuring that programs written for MLton are highly portable and conform to the expected language standards.
  • Rich Optimization
    The compiler includes numerous optimization techniques, enabling better runtime performance and memory usage for compiled applications.
  • Large Language Support
    MLton supports the full breadth of the Standard ML language, including advanced features like functors and modules.

Possible disadvantages of MLton

  • Compilation Time
    Due to its whole-program optimization techniques, MLton can take longer to compile programs compared to other compilers that use separate compilation.
  • Executable Size
    Although MLton optimizes for performance, this can sometimes result in larger executable sizes than compilers that don't perform as many optimizations.
  • Limited Interactivity
    MLton is optimized for batch processing and does not provide interactive development features like a REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop), which can be a downside for some developers used to interactive programming environments.
  • Platform Availability
    While MLton supports several platforms, its availability may not be as widespread as other more commonly used programming environments, which could limit use in certain contexts.

CodeSignal features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coding Assessments
    CodeSignal provides a wide range of coding challenges and assessments that cover multiple programming languages and skill levels, making it suitable for diverse hiring needs.
  • Data-Driven Insights
    It offers detailed analytics and reports on candidates' coding performance, which helps in making informed hiring decisions based on real data.
  • Customizable Tests
    Companies can create custom coding tests tailored to specific job roles and requirements, ensuring that candidates are assessed on the most relevant skills.
  • Real-World Scenarios
    The platform includes coding tasks that mimic real-world problems, providing a better gauge of how candidates will perform in practical situations.
  • Ease of Use
    The user-friendly interface makes it easy for both recruiters and candidates to navigate the platform and complete assessments.
  • Integration Capabilities
    CodeSignal integrates well with other HR and recruiting tools, streamlining the workflow for hiring teams.

Possible disadvantages of CodeSignal

  • Cost
    The platform can be expensive for small and medium-sized businesses, limiting its accessibility to larger organizations with bigger budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, there may be a learning curve for new users, especially those not familiar with technical hiring tools.
  • Limited Candidate Pool
    Since users need to have some level of coding proficiency to perform well, it might not be suitable for assessing candidates who are just starting out or are from non-technical backgrounds.
  • Potential for Overfitting
    Candidates familiar with CodeSignal's specific types of questions and problems may perform better, which might not always reflect their overall coding abilities.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-based platform, it requires a stable internet connection, which might pose challenges in regions with limited connectivity.

Analysis of CodeSignal

Overall verdict

  • Overall, CodeSignal is considered a valuable resource for both individuals looking to enhance their programming skills and companies aiming to streamline their hiring processes. Its comprehensive set of tools and user-friendly interface make it a good choice for technical evaluations.

Why this product is good

  • CodeSignal is a popular platform for technical skill assessments and interview practice, offering a wide range of coding tasks across various difficulty levels. It allows users to improve their coding skills, provides a realistic environment for job interview preparation, and offers detailed feedback on performance.

Recommended for

  • Software developers preparing for technical interviews
  • Companies conducting technical assessments for hiring
  • Students learning programming and computer science concepts
  • Anyone looking to improve their problem-solving skills in coding

MLton videos

No MLton videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CodeSignal videos

+ Add

CodeSignal Talent Stories: Marcus Currie + Evernote

More videos:

  • Review - "depositProfit" CodeSignal challenge review
  • Review - Python - CodeSignal Feedback Review 15

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MLton and CodeSignal)

MLton

CodeSignal

OOP
100 100%
OOP
0% 0
Hiring And Recruitment
0 0%
Hiring And Recruitment
100% 100
Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Online Learning
0 0%
Online Learning
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MLton and CodeSignal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MLton and CodeSignal

MLton Reviews

We have no reviews of MLton yet.
Be the first one to post

CodeSignal Reviews

Examining Top 22 Alternatives to LeetCode
CodeSignal is a technical interview and assessment solution that helps organizations identify quality candidates quickly. Our platform allows recruiters and hiring managers to design consistent and well-researched tech screens and assessments. We offer a cloud-based software with advanced coding environments, supporting over 70 coding languages. CodeSignal integrates with...
Source: www.inven.ai
LeetCode Alternatives: Top platforms for coding practice
What are LeetCode and LeetCode alternatives good for?LeetCode💡Interested in leveling up your career? Apply to the Formation Fellowship today!ApplyHackerRankCodeSignalAlgoExpertCodewarsGeeksforGeeksEdabitExercismTopCoderShould you use LeetCode for advanced interview prep?Get holistic interview prep with Formation
Source: formation.dev
Discover the Top Leetcode Alternatives
CodeSignal is renowned for its standardized coding assessments and a robust IDE. It's an excellent platform for interview preparation and improving coding skills through timed challenges.
Source: codenquest.com
Top 25 websites for coding challenge and competition [Updated for 2021]
CodeSignal has a technical interview practice that helps you get ready for technical interviews by completing real-world assessments in an advanced IDE. It starts with customizing a personal study plan, then helps you master key topics by solving real-world questions.
Source: towardsdatascience.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeSignal should be more popular than MLton. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MLton mentions (5)

  • Simple JSON parser in c++, rust, ocaml, standard ml
    Once I got the parser ready in OCaml, I thought I port it to Standard ML, since it belong to the same ML language family. I was also curious on how well mlton could optimise it. The language lacks custom let bindings, so I resorted to use Result.bind manually. This makes code much less readable and more verbose. The standard library also lacks result type, so I had to come up with my own simple implementation.... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ante: A low-level functional language
    If you’re fine with tracing GC (which depends on the situation, of course), Standard ML is a perfectly boring language (that IIUC predated and inspired Caml) and MLton[1] is a very nice optimizing compiler for it. The language is awkward at times (in particular, the separate sublanguage of modules can be downright unwieldy), and the library has some of the usual blind spots such as nonexistent Unicode support... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Write your own programming language in an hour with Chumsky
    Unfortunately, I haven't found a ton of "easily-digestible" and, at the same time, comprehensive guides on compiling functional languages. Generally you'll find a mix of blog posts/class notes/papers covering a single step. Some resources I like: - Andrew Kennedy's 2007 paper Compiling with Continuations, Continued [1]. This one is the most clear IMO - Andrew Appel's Compiling with Continuations book... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Why are imperative programs considered faster than their functional counterparts?
    More broadly, they can be fast even without such extensions if they aggressively pursue optimization opportunities afforded by static typing, like MLton for example, but that also impacts compilation performance negatively. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Coalton: How to Have Our (Typed) Cake and (Safely) Eat It Too, in Common Lisp
    According to the OP, it's from http://mlton.org/ (see https://coalton-lang.github.io/20211010-introducing-coalton/#acknowledgements ). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

CodeSignal mentions (26)

  • Personal Guide to Becoming a Good Developer
    When I started, I programmed many different things in different languages. Then, I found a job as a Junior Java Developer and solved tasks on CodeSignal every day. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • 💼 50 Tips to Land a Remote Tech Job Based on My 45-Day Journey to 2 Offers
    Platforms like HackerRank and CodeSignal host challenges that not only hone your skills but also can put you on the radar of tech companies looking for talent. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 20 Things You Should Consider When You Grow as a Developer
    Regularly engaging with problem-solving and algorithm challenges on platforms such as LeetCode, HackerRank, or CodeSignal can significantly sharpen this ability. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • The Definitive Programming Roadmap: From Novice to Expert
    Coding Challenges: Platforms like Project Euler or CodeSignal offer a variety of problems that encourage logical thinking and algorithmic problem-solving. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 20 ways for Developers to boost income 💰
    Engage in remote hackathons and competitions on platforms like Devpost, CodeSignal, and Topcoder. Showcase your coding prowess and win cash prizes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MLton and CodeSignal, you can also consider the following products

Poly/ML - The Poly/ML implementation of Standard ML – full multiprocessor support in the thread library and garbage collector, interactive debugger, fast compiler.

HackerRank - HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.

OCaml - (* Binary tree with leaves carrying an integer.

Codility - Codility provides a SaaS platform with advanced validation, security and protection features to evaluate the skills of software engineers.

Guile - Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.

iMocha - Make intelligent talent decisions.

Loading...