Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mixer by Microsoft VS Beam Interactive

Compare Mixer by Microsoft VS Beam Interactive and see what are their differences

Mixer by Microsoft logo Mixer by Microsoft

Interactive live streaming

Beam Interactive logo Beam Interactive

Interact with your favorite streamer's gameplay in realtime
  • Mixer by Microsoft Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15
  • Beam Interactive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Mixer by Microsoft features and specs

  • Low Latency Streaming
    Mixer offers faster-than-light (FTL) streaming protocol, which results in minimal delay, making it highly interactive for streamers and viewers.
  • Interactive Features
    Mixer allows for interactive features where viewers can directly influence the gameplay or streaming environment through live actions, enhancing engagement.
  • Co-streaming
    The platform supports co-streaming, allowing up to four streamers to combine their streams into a single viewer experience.
  • Integration with Xbox
    Mixer is directly integrated into Xbox consoles, making it easier for console gamers to stream without additional software.
  • Monetization Options
    Streamers on Mixer can benefit from various monetization methods like subscriptions and Embers, providing potential revenue streams.

Possible disadvantages of Mixer by Microsoft

  • Limited Audience Reach
    Compared to Twitch and YouTube, Mixer had a smaller audience, which could limit exposure and growth for streamers.
  • Lack of Features
    Some users felt that Mixer lacked certain features and tools that were available on other streaming platforms, affecting user experience.
  • Shutdown
    Mixer was shut down in July 2020, with Microsoft's decision to partner with Facebook Gaming instead, which makes it unavailable for new users.
  • Content Discovery
    Users reported difficulties in discovering new content or streamers compared to other platforms with more developed discovery systems.
  • Less Developed Community
    Due to its smaller user base, Mixer did not have as developed or diverse a community as its competitors, leading to less networking opportunities for streamers.

Beam Interactive features and specs

  • Low Latency Streaming
    Beam Interactive offered a low latency streaming experience, which enabled near real-time interaction between streamers and viewers, enhancing interactive content opportunities.
  • Interactive Features
    The platform provided unique interactive features that allowed viewers to participate directly in the streaming experience, such as voting or triggering events, making streams more engaging.
  • Integration with Xbox
    Due to its integration with Xbox, Beam Interactive allowed for seamless streaming capabilities for gamers, providing an easy way for console players to stream their gameplay.
  • Community Engagement
    Beam Interactive fostered a strong community environment due to its interactive nature, promoting better engagement and closeness between content creators and their audiences.

Possible disadvantages of Beam Interactive

  • Limited Audience Reach
    Compared to competitors like Twitch or YouTube, Beam Interactive had a smaller audience reach, which could be a disadvantage for streamers looking to grow a large viewer base.
  • Platform Closure
    Beam Interactive, later branded as Mixer, was eventually shut down in 2020, which ended all services and forced streamers and viewers to transition to other platforms.
  • Monetization Challenges
    Streamers on Beam Interactive faced challenges in monetizing their content compared to more established platforms which had more advanced monetization options.
  • Limited Features for Non-Gaming Content
    While Beam Interactive was great for gaming content, it provided limited features and support for non-gaming streamers, restricting its appeal to other types of creators.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mixer by Microsoft and Beam Interactive)
Video Streaming
47 47%
53% 53
Facebook
51 51%
49% 49
Live Streaming
52 52%
48% 48
Games
43 43%
57% 57

User comments

Share your experience with using Mixer by Microsoft and Beam Interactive. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Beam Interactive seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mixer by Microsoft mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Mixer by Microsoft yet. Tracking of Mixer by Microsoft recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Beam Interactive mentions (2)

  • Today is Toasts last day on facebook gaming
    No, is just type fb.gg or mixer.com but it is a horrible platform, in general terms of the interface, the video player and especially the chat. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Just a couple days until the famous G*mer hate rally. 😤😤
    Go to mixer.com and it'll take you to facebook gaming. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mixer by Microsoft and Beam Interactive, you can also consider the following products

Shipstreams - A list of makers shipping live

Twitch Creative - Watch artists create. Twitch expands into the arts.

Twidy App - Tinder for Twitter - Tidy up and declutter your timeline

CleanTimeline - Your Twitter timeline without any distractions or ads

twitcasting - No more Justin.tv? Say hi to live streaming on your phone!

Twitch Installs Arch Linux - Try to Install Arch Linux via Twitch Chat! or Sabbotage!