Miro VS NZBGet

Miro Reviews

NZBGet Reviews

Miro mentions (231)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Miro - Scalable, secure, cross-device, and enterprise-ready collaboration whiteboard for distributed teams. With a freemium plan. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Initial impressions and questions

  For your project, you actually might have a better time using Miro. I use Miro for doing pretty much any kind of presentation of grammar for my classes (I'm a language teacher) and love the ease and flexibility with which you can organise neat looking flow charts. Source: 5 months ago

• 10 key features of online collaboration tools and software

  Getting together around a whiteboard is one of the most productive ways for people to collaborate in a room together. Miro recreates that easy collaboration for remote teams with its multiplayer online whiteboards. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

• How We Started Managing BSA Delivery Processes on GitHub

  We also had other tools in use, such as Miro. This tool was primarily used for visualizing certain process flows, like document change approval processes. Or at some point, we considered using boards in Asana because non-delivery processes were managed in that tool. However, when we contemplated the move to Asana, I decided to explore other potential tools. After reading many articles and conducting some research,... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Building a Leadership Development Program, step-by-step

  All of my teams are remote so I feel you. My favorite tool for this is Figjam but Miro is nearly as good. Everyone connects to a virtual board and puts stickies on the board. The software includes a timer and even voting tools that are easy to use and visual for everyone. Figjam is one of the best tools available for getting remote team member to actively participate in discussions, brainstorming, etc. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

NZBGet mentions (8)

• nzbget-ng discussion location

  The only reason for the new nzbget-ng github org is that I've been unable to reach hugbug to ask if he'd transfer it (and things like nzbget.net, etc. For pushing out updated versions). This is unfortunate and makes the whole exercise a lot more painful. Not least of which is the widespread assumption that the project is dead, rather than being maintained by someone new. Source: about 1 year ago

• Uninstall Nzbget on Debian (Help)

  Followed the Linux instructions on nzbget.net. Source: over 1 year ago

• New to Usenet, I need help getting the one thing I need, I'm also very dumb

  I needed to find a "higher than youtube quality" version of a demo album, which the only working downloads I've found for them is in an Nzb file (https://livegigs.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=110), and I've figured out that it's related to usenet and all that. But I'm also a dumbass and don't know what to do from here. So far I've downloaded and instaled NZBGET, acted like it was a torrent file and now its in a... Source: almost 2 years ago

• A Comprehensive Guide on How To Automate your Seedboxing

  NZBGet NZBGet is a binary downloader, which downloads files from Usenet based on information given in nzb-files. It is generally more performant than SABNZBd from my experiences. Source: about 2 years ago

• TLS certificate verification failed for nzbget.net

  It appears that my installation has a problem with https://nzbget.net only, and the full error is:. Source: over 2 years ago