Microsoft SQL VS ProxySQL

Compare Microsoft SQL VS ProxySQL and see what are their differences

Cyclr

Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Microsoft SQL

Microsoft SQL is a best in class relational database management software that facilitates the database server to provide you a primary function to store and retrieve data.

ProxySQL

ProxySQL: high-performance, GPL licensed MySQL proxy. It supports hundreds of thousands of concurrent connections and can be multiplexed to hundreds of servers.

Landing page //
2023-01-26

Landing page //
2023-05-23

Microsoft SQL

Website: microsoft.com
Pricing URL: -
$ Details: -

Edit details

ProxySQL

Website: proxysql.com
Pricing URL: Official ProxySQL Pricing
$ Details

Edit details

Microsoft SQL features and specs

Comprehensive Feature Set
SQL Server offers a wide range of features including advanced analytics, in-memory capabilities, robust security measures, and integration services.
High Performance
With in-memory OLTP and support for persistent memory technologies, SQL Server provides high transaction and query performance.
Scalability
SQL Server can scale from small installations on single machines to large, data-intensive applications requiring high throughput and storage.
Security
SQL Server offers advanced security features like encryption, dynamic data masking, and advanced threat protection, ensuring data safety and compliance.
Integrations
It easily integrates with other Microsoft products such as Azure, Power BI, and Active Directory, providing a cohesive ecosystem for enterprise solutions.
Developer Friendly
It supports a wide range of development tools and languages including .NET, Python, Java, and more, making it highly versatile for developers.
High Availability
Features like Always On availability groups and failover clustering provide high availability and disaster recovery options for critical applications.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL

Cost
SQL Server can be expensive, particularly for the Enterprise edition. Licensing costs can add up quickly depending on the features and scale required.
Complexity
Due to its comprehensive feature set, SQL Server can be complex to configure and manage, requiring skilled administrators and developers.
Resource Intensive
SQL Server can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial hardware resources for optimal performance, which can increase overall operational costs.
Windows-Centric
While SQL Server can run on Linux, it is primarily optimized for and tightly integrated with the Windows ecosystem, which may not suit all organizations.
Vendor Lock-In
Being a proprietary solution, it can cause vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch to alternative database systems without significant migration efforts.

ProxySQL features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Microsoft SQL

Overall verdict

Yes, Microsoft SQL Server is generally regarded as a good choice for database management, particularly for organizations that require high performance, reliability, and seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies.

Why this product is good

Microsoft SQL Server is considered a robust database management system because of its comprehensive features such as high scalability, strong security, and excellent integration with other Microsoft products. It provides tools for data mining, warehousing, and analytics, making it a popular choice for enterprises. Additionally, it offers high availability and disaster recovery solutions, and its active community provides extensive support and resources.

Recommended for

Enterprises
Businesses using Microsoft ecosystems
Organizations requiring robust data security
Users needing scalability for large datasets
Projects needing high availability and disaster recovery

Microsoft SQL videos

+ Add

3.1 Microsoft SQL Server Review

ProxySQL videos

+ Add

#ProxySQL Use Case Scenarios - #ProxySQL #Database Tutorial - René Cannaò - #Percona Live 2017

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft SQL and ProxySQL)

ProxySQL

Databases

95 95%

Databases

5% 5

MySQL Tools

0 0%

MySQL Tools

100% 100

Relational Databases

100 100%

Relational Databases

0% 0

Tool

100 100%

Tool

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL and ProxySQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ProxySQL seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft SQL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft SQL yet. Tracking of Microsoft SQL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ProxySQL mentions (11)

PostgreSQL High Availability Solutions – Part 1: Jepsen Test and Patroni
We use proxysql (https://proxysql.com) which works very well. We have not seen any downtime for years. We wrote our own master promotion code a very long time ago; it has proven to be very robust. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Save Cost on RDS Data Transfer - Internet - Out
Another option could be ProxySQL, where you can cache queries on the ProxySQL server. Source: about 2 years ago
Is replication between v5.1 and v8 possible?
Also, if you're not using it yet, I can recommend looking at ProxySQL to do your read-write/read-only failover controls. Source: over 2 years ago
SSL Termination for SQL
What are the recommendations here? I took a look into ProxySQL and it looks like since v2, it can do frontend and backend SSL connections. I have it locally working on a docker setup. Source: over 2 years ago
Business complexity with performance
DB: Split you write-read operations. You may scale read as needed. Write operations can be slow if you have too many indices, so make sure to use only the ones you really need. Your DBMS may have some configuration to optimise, for example in MySQL if you do NOT need ACID compliance you can set innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2 to achieve better write speed. For MySQL you should also look into https://proxysql.com/. Source: over 2 years ago