Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Yjs

Compare Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS Yjs and see what are their differences

Microsoft SQL Server Compact logo Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

Yjs logo Yjs

A CRDT framework with a powerful abstraction of shared data, Shared data types for building collaborative software
  • Microsoft SQL Server Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26
  • Yjs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-01

Microsoft SQL Server Compact features and specs

  • Lightweight and Portable
    Microsoft SQL Server Compact is a lightweight database solution that can be easily deployed with applications, making it ideal for desktop, mobile, and small-scale web applications.
  • In-Process Database Engine
    The database engine runs within the application process, which eliminates the need for a separate server, reducing system complexity and resource usage.
  • Zero-configuration Needed
    SQL Server Compact requires no installation or configuration, which simplifies deployment for developers and end users alike.
  • Free to Use
    It is free, which makes it a cost-effective solution for small projects or for inclusion in commercial and non-commercial applications.
  • Integration with Visual Studio
    Offers seamless integration with Microsoft Visual Studio, providing an easy-to-use development experience for .NET developers.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL Server Compact

  • Limited Features
    It lacks some advanced features found in other editions of SQL Server, such as stored procedures, triggers, and advanced security features, which may be necessary for more complex applications.
  • Not Suitable for Large Applications
    Designed for smaller, single-user applications, SQL Server Compact is not suitable for large, multi-user, or distributed database scenarios.
  • End of Life Considerations
    With advancements in other Microsoft data solutions and no major updates being released for SQL Server Compact, developers may need to consider future migration strategies.
  • Limited Storage Capacity
    The maximum database size is constrained, limiting its ability to handle extensive data storage needs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Being an older technology, it might face compatibility issues with newer technologies and platforms.

Yjs features and specs

  • Real-time Collaboration
    Yjs enables real-time collaborative editing, allowing multiple users to work on the same document simultaneously without conflicts.
  • Conflict-free Replicated Data Type (CRDT)
    Yjs employs CRDTs to automatically resolve changes and conflicts, eliminating the need for complex merging algorithms.
  • Scalability
    The framework is designed to efficiently handle a large number of users, making it suitable for large-scale collaborative applications.
  • Offline Editing
    Yjs supports offline editing, allowing users to make changes while disconnected from the network and synchronizing them once back online.
  • Language Agnostic
    Yjs can be integrated with different programming languages, making it flexible for various tech stacks.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Yjs provides full transparency of its codebase and fosters a supportive community for continuous improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Yjs

  • Complexity of CRDTs
    While powerful, CRDTs introduce a level of complexity that might be challenging for developers unfamiliar with distributed systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers may need time to understand and effectively implement Yjs, especially if they are new to real-time collaboration frameworks.
  • Integration Overhead
    Adding Yjs to an existing application might require significant changes in the architecture, particularly if the app wasn't initially designed for real-time collaboration.
  • Performance Overhead
    Handling a large amount of operational transformations in real-time can introduce performance overhead, especially in less optimized implementations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Yjs)
NoSQL Databases
81 81%
19% 19
Databases
64 64%
36% 36
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Yjs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Yjs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft SQL Server Compact yet. Tracking of Microsoft SQL Server Compact recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Yjs mentions (19)

  • Multi-player Mode is Everywhere, Even in Dev Tools
    Of course, you don’t have to code this functionality from scratch! You can also look at open-source software like Yjs, text-crdt, Automerge and so many more. Alternatively, you can check out tools like Liveblocks, Ably, etc. Which enable collaborative multi-player features. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: JuntOS – A shared Pomodoro and focus tools
    I've built this app some time ago but only shared with close friends. It has been useful for me so I decided to share here. It works by sharing state with yjs [1], as long as you are in the same session, i.e. The same path. https://github.com/yjs/yjs. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Oops.js
    I write undo/redo/history in web/JS extensively. This the best lib out there for such tasks IMHO: https://github.com/yjs/yjs And you're right. You don't want undo/redo only in multi-user apps. You want to have each user have their own local undo/redo events that they can apply and unapply from the shared state which has its own events apart from each user. Everyone... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Oops.js
    After reviewing the ~600 lines of code, I have to ask what about this undo/redo manager is "advanced"? This seems like a naive implementation of a snapshot collection that is selected via array index. It's not event sourcing, OT or CRDT. With every event, the entire object is serialized and put into the heap. I can't even imagine what this does for performance when you deal with any object of significant size.... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • An Interactive Intro to CRDTs
    I've seen it come up often in collaborative text editors. Also see: https://github.com/yjs/yjs. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft SQL Server Compact and Yjs, you can also consider the following products

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

Thymer - Web-based Project management and task planning for people who hate project management and task planning. For individuals, teams and small businesses.

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

RxDB - A fast, offline-first, reactive Database for JavaScript Applications

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

Automerge - A JSON-like data structure (a CRDT) that can be modified concurrently by different users, and merged again automatically.