Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS GraphSQL

Compare Microsoft SQL Server Compact VS GraphSQL and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Microsoft SQL Server Compact logo Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

GraphSQL logo GraphSQL

GraphSQL offers real-time database management systems for big graph data that can optimize enterprise operations.
  • Microsoft SQL Server Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26
  • GraphSQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-01

Microsoft SQL Server Compact features and specs

  • Lightweight and Portable
    Microsoft SQL Server Compact is a lightweight database solution that can be easily deployed with applications, making it ideal for desktop, mobile, and small-scale web applications.
  • In-Process Database Engine
    The database engine runs within the application process, which eliminates the need for a separate server, reducing system complexity and resource usage.
  • Zero-configuration Needed
    SQL Server Compact requires no installation or configuration, which simplifies deployment for developers and end users alike.
  • Free to Use
    It is free, which makes it a cost-effective solution for small projects or for inclusion in commercial and non-commercial applications.
  • Integration with Visual Studio
    Offers seamless integration with Microsoft Visual Studio, providing an easy-to-use development experience for .NET developers.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL Server Compact

  • Limited Features
    It lacks some advanced features found in other editions of SQL Server, such as stored procedures, triggers, and advanced security features, which may be necessary for more complex applications.
  • Not Suitable for Large Applications
    Designed for smaller, single-user applications, SQL Server Compact is not suitable for large, multi-user, or distributed database scenarios.
  • End of Life Considerations
    With advancements in other Microsoft data solutions and no major updates being released for SQL Server Compact, developers may need to consider future migration strategies.
  • Limited Storage Capacity
    The maximum database size is constrained, limiting its ability to handle extensive data storage needs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Being an older technology, it might face compatibility issues with newer technologies and platforms.

GraphSQL features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft SQL Server Compact and GraphSQL)

Microsoft SQL Server Compact

GraphSQL

Databases
80 80%
Databases
20% 20
NoSQL Databases
80 80%
NoSQL Databases
20% 20
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Graph Databases
0 0%
Graph Databases
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL Server Compact and GraphSQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft SQL Server Compact and GraphSQL, you can also consider the following products

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

GrapheneDB - Graph databases as-a-service

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

Grapholytic - grapholytic by MIOsoft produces results from the combination of a Graph DB and a scalable object database architecture.

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

Apache TinkerPop - Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP).

Loading...