Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GrapheneDB VS Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Compare GrapheneDB VS Microsoft SQL Server Compact and see what are their differences

GrapheneDB logo GrapheneDB

Graph databases as-a-service

Microsoft SQL Server Compact logo Microsoft SQL Server Compact

Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.
  • GrapheneDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Microsoft SQL Server Compact Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26

GrapheneDB features and specs

  • Scalability
    GrapheneDB offers effortless scaling options that cater to growing data needs, allowing businesses to adapt and expand without significant infrastructure changes.
  • Graph Database Expertise
    GrapheneDB is dedicated to providing specialized support and optimization specifically for graph databases, ensuring performance and reliability for graph-related operations.
  • Managed Hosting
    The platform offers fully managed hosting services, which reduce the need for in-house database administration and infrastructure maintenance.
  • Ease of Use
    GrapheneDB provides a user-friendly interface with tools that simplify the management and deployment of graph databases even for those with limited technical expertise.
  • Security
    The service prioritizes data security through robust encryption, regular backups, and compliance with industry standards, protecting sensitive information.

Possible disadvantages of GrapheneDB

  • Cost
    For small businesses or individual developers, the pricing model of GrapheneDB may be considered expensive, especially compared to open-source alternatives.
  • Dependency on Cloud
    Relying on a cloud service can lead to issues with control over data and infrastructure, including potential downtimes or changes in service terms.
  • Limited to Neo4j
    GrapheneDB is specifically designed for Neo4j databases, which may not be suitable for users who wish to explore other graph database technologies.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using a specific platform could result in vendor lock-in, where transferring data or switching providers becomes complex and resource-intensive.
  • Potential Performance Issues
    Depending on the scale and specific use case, users may encounter performance limits that require a custom setup not fully offered by managed solutions.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact features and specs

  • Lightweight and Portable
    Microsoft SQL Server Compact is a lightweight database solution that can be easily deployed with applications, making it ideal for desktop, mobile, and small-scale web applications.
  • In-Process Database Engine
    The database engine runs within the application process, which eliminates the need for a separate server, reducing system complexity and resource usage.
  • Zero-configuration Needed
    SQL Server Compact requires no installation or configuration, which simplifies deployment for developers and end users alike.
  • Free to Use
    It is free, which makes it a cost-effective solution for small projects or for inclusion in commercial and non-commercial applications.
  • Integration with Visual Studio
    Offers seamless integration with Microsoft Visual Studio, providing an easy-to-use development experience for .NET developers.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL Server Compact

  • Limited Features
    It lacks some advanced features found in other editions of SQL Server, such as stored procedures, triggers, and advanced security features, which may be necessary for more complex applications.
  • Not Suitable for Large Applications
    Designed for smaller, single-user applications, SQL Server Compact is not suitable for large, multi-user, or distributed database scenarios.
  • End of Life Considerations
    With advancements in other Microsoft data solutions and no major updates being released for SQL Server Compact, developers may need to consider future migration strategies.
  • Limited Storage Capacity
    The maximum database size is constrained, limiting its ability to handle extensive data storage needs.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Being an older technology, it might face compatibility issues with newer technologies and platforms.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GrapheneDB and Microsoft SQL Server Compact)
Graph Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
28 28%
72% 72
NoSQL Databases
26 26%
74% 74
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GrapheneDB and Microsoft SQL Server Compact. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GrapheneDB and Microsoft SQL Server Compact, you can also consider the following products

neo4j - Meet Neo4j: The graph database platform powering today's mission-critical enterprise applications, including artificial intelligence, fraud detection and recommendations.

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

Apache TinkerPop - Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP).

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

Grapholytic - grapholytic by MIOsoft produces results from the combination of a Graph DB and a scalable object database architecture.

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.