Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft Azure Functions VS Cisco CloudCenter

Compare Microsoft Azure Functions VS Cisco CloudCenter and see what are their differences

Microsoft Azure Functions logo Microsoft Azure Functions

Serverless, also known as FaaS (Function-as-a-Service), is a new approach to application development. FaaS is a form of serverless computing with an infrastructure managed by the provider to upload functions and use them on a pay-per-request basis.

Cisco CloudCenter logo Cisco CloudCenter

Cisco CloudCenter is an application-defined cloud management solution for deploying and administration of application around data centers, public, and private cloud resources.
  • Microsoft Azure Functions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-09
  • Cisco CloudCenter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Microsoft Azure Functions features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Functions automatically scale based on demand, allowing you to handle massive workloads without manual intervention.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    You are billed only for the time your code runs, making it cost-effective compared to maintaining always-on servers.
  • Simplified Deployment
    Azure Functions support a variety of languages and have integrations that simplify deployment and development.
  • Integrations
    Built-in integrations with Azure services, third-party services, and APIs make it easier to build complex workflows.
  • Event-Driven
    Triggers and bindings for a wide range of events (HTTP requests, database changes, event queues) make it versatile for different use cases.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft Azure Functions

  • Cold Start Latency
    Functions can experience latency issues during 'cold starts' when they haven't been invoked for a while.
  • Debugging Challenges
    Debugging serverless functions can be more challenging compared to traditional applications due to the distributed nature of the architecture.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on Azure-specific services and integrations may make it difficult to migrate to another platform.
  • Resource Limits
    There are limits on execution time, memory usage, and other resources which can impact performance for some applications.
  • Complexity in Monitoring
    Monitoring and logging require more setup and understanding compared to traditional applications, which might complicate operational workflows.

Cisco CloudCenter features and specs

  • Hybrid Cloud Support
    Cisco CloudCenter allows businesses to manage applications across both public and private clouds, offering the flexibility to optimize workloads based on costs, performance, and compliance requirements.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the deployment and management of applications in the cloud, making it accessible for IT teams with varying levels of cloud expertise.
  • Robust Security Features
    Cisco CloudCenter integrates with existing security frameworks and provides advanced security measures to ensure data protection across cloud environments, meeting various compliance standards.
  • Scalability
    The solution is designed to scale based on application demand, allowing businesses to efficiently use resources and manage costs by adjusting capacity as needed.
  • Comprehensive Support and Integration
    Cisco CloudCenter is backed by Cisco's extensive support network and integrates seamlessly with a wide range of tools, enhancing its functionality and utility within existing IT environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cisco CloudCenter

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a thorough understanding of both cloud environments and the Cisco ecosystem.
  • Cost
    The pricing structure for Cisco CloudCenter can be high for small to medium-sized businesses, particularly if advanced features and support are required.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and capabilities, users may face a steep learning curve, necessitating training and adaptation time for the IT staff.
  • Dependency on Cisco Ecosystem
    Companies heavily invested in other cloud management tools might face challenges with integration, leading to potential vendor lock-in due to the strong integration with Cisco products.
  • Performance Overheads
    There can be performance overheads when managing complex multi-cloud environments, which could impact the efficiency of application deployment and management.

Microsoft Azure Functions videos

No Microsoft Azure Functions videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cisco CloudCenter videos

EMA Product Review - Cisco CloudCenter

More videos:

  • Demo - Cisco CloudCenter SoftLayer Demo
  • Review - EMA Cloud Rants - Cisco CloudCenter

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft Azure Functions and Cisco CloudCenter)
Cloud Hosting
54 54%
46% 46
Cloud Computing
60 60%
40% 40
Developer Tools
72 72%
28% 28
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft Azure Functions and Cisco CloudCenter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Microsoft Azure Functions seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft Azure Functions mentions (22)

  • Azure Functions with Python: Triggers
    Python developers can use Azure Functions to create lightweight, scalable, and efficient serverless applications. In this post, we will focus on triggers. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Deploying Azure Functions with Python: A Step-by-Step Guide
    Azure Functions is a serverless computing service provided by Microsoft Azure, enabling developers to run event-driven code without worrying about server management. In this article, we’ll walk through how to deploy Azure Functions using Python. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A Brief History Of Serverless
    The FaaS platform gained a lot of popularity which resulted in many competitors. There was OSS providers like OpenFaaS or Fission. There were of course the commercial versions to like Azure Functions and Google Cloud Functions. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Implementing serverless architecture in React Native apps
    Serverless technology helps React Native developers create more robust, adaptable, and efficient mobile applications that meet the demands of today's dynamic digital landscape. By seamlessly integrating cloud functions from providers like AWS Lambda or Azure Functions, developers can tap into a world of possibilities to enrich their mobile apps. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Decoupler and future implications for legacy-proof UI code
    Azure Functions: Here’s the official Azure Functions product page, where you can learn about the features, benefits, and pricing of Microsoft’s serverless computing service. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Cisco CloudCenter mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cisco CloudCenter yet. Tracking of Cisco CloudCenter recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft Azure Functions and Cisco CloudCenter, you can also consider the following products

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

AWS Elastic Beanstalk - Quickly deploy and manage applications in the AWS cloud.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Docker - Docker is an open platform that enables developers and system administrators to create distributed applications.