Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MicroFocus DevInspect VS Charles Proxy

Compare MicroFocus DevInspect VS Charles Proxy and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

MicroFocus DevInspect logo MicroFocus DevInspect

DevInspect is a secure coding tool designed specifically for developers who need agile development but cannot compromise on application security.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
  • MicroFocus DevInspect Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

MicroFocus DevInspect features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Testing
    DevInspect offers a wide range of security testing features that can help identify vulnerabilities in web applications, ensuring a thorough assessment of potential security risks.
  • Integration with Development Tools
    The product can be seamlessly integrated with various development environments and CI/CD pipelines, enhancing workflow efficiency by allowing developers to identify and fix security issues early in the development cycle.
  • Ease of Use
    Designed with a user-friendly interface, DevInspect caters to both security professionals and developers, making it accessible to users with varying levels of expertise.
  • Regular Updates
    Micro Focus provides frequent updates and support to ensure DevInspect is equipped to handle the latest security vulnerabilities and threats.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Offers comprehensive reporting features that provide detailed insights into security flaws and recommendations for remediation, which is crucial for understanding and addressing vulnerabilities effectively.

Possible disadvantages of MicroFocus DevInspect

  • Complexity in Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of DevInspect may be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring significant technical expertise or support from Micro Focus.
  • Cost
    As a high-end security solution, DevInspect can be expensive, which might be a constraint for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, mastering all the features and functionalities may require considerable time and training, particularly for users new to application security.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running comprehensive security tests can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting system performance and requiring robust infrastructure to handle extensive analyses efficiently.
  • Limited Language Support
    DevInspect may have limitations regarding the range of programming languages and technologies it supports, which could be a drawback for organizations using less common technologies.

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MicroFocus DevInspect and Charles Proxy)
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MicroFocus DevInspect and Charles Proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MicroFocus DevInspect and Charles Proxy

MicroFocus DevInspect Reviews

We have no reviews of MicroFocus DevInspect yet.
Be the first one to post

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MicroFocus DevInspect and Charles Proxy, you can also consider the following products

Verimatrix App Security - Verimatrix App Security offers 24/7 protection for Android and iOS applications.

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

ImmuniWeb MobileSuite - ImmuniWeb MobileSuite offers a complete DevSecOps equipped solution to conduct efficient mobile penetration testing along with threat reduction guidelines.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Codified Security - Codified Security is a testing platform for mobile application software.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.