Micro VS ST - Simple Terminal

Micro Reviews

ST - Simple Terminal Reviews

Micro mentions (76)

• Modeless Vim

  Is Micro[0] not a better, more purpose-fit solution to these issues? (Syntax highlighting quality, etc) Prev discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37171294. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Essential Command Line Tools for Developers

  To see more screenshots of micro, showcasing some of the default color schemes, see here. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• A simple guide for configuring sudo and doas

  There are two main ways to configure sudo.The first one is using the sudoers file.It is located at /etc/sudoers for Linux,and /usr/local/etc/sudoers for FreeBSD respectively.The paths are different,but the configuration works in the same way. A typical sudoers file looks like this. The sudoers file must be edited with the visudo command,which ensures the config is free of errors.Running this command as the... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Microsoft is exploring adding a command line text editor into Windows, and it wants your feedback

  I really like micro, a nano-like editor with a very sane, regular people friendly keybinding. Source: 5 months ago

• Revolutionizing Text Editor Navigation and Altarnative to Vim and GNUEmacs

  I am all for your efforts. I am very keyboard centric. My sweet spot is macOS keyboard shortcuts. Especially those as defined by BBEdit. But I have learned from all the platforms I have worked on. (TRS-DOS, MSDOS, OS/2, macOS, Windows, Linux) I never get into Vim primarily because of HJKL. I have spent many hours trying. But I do use IJKL as arrow keys via hardware keyboard macros, AutoHotKey, Karabiner Elements,... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

ST - Simple Terminal mentions (44)

• Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."

  > you need to "edit your makefile". That isn't going to work for distributions Is it not? [st] requires exactly that. And distros seem to have no issues shipping it. [st] https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Write Your Own Terminal

  Check out st[1] for a minimal terminal implementation. They also have user-submitted patches that you can apply to add desired functionality. [1] https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Tabby: A terminal for a more modern age

  I am fundamentally and ideologically opposed to using a terminal emulator implemented in electron. If you feel similarly, then you might enjoy https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Warp? A terminal behind login popup

  My journey of using terminal emulators began together with my introduction to Linux about 7 years ago. GNOME terminal was my first as it came pre-installed on Ubuntu, my first Linux distribution. Since then, I've had the opportunity to explore and utilize a range of terminal emulators, including Alacritty, Kitty, st, Konsole, xterm, and most recently iTerm2. It's been interesting to experiment with these different... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

• XTerm: It's Better Than You Thought (2021)

  For those looking for a minimal VT100 terminal emulator without the legacy baggage of Xterm, I highly recommend checking out Suckless Software’s st: https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago