Software Alternatives & Reviews

mg VS JOE

Compare mg VS JOE and see what are their differences

mg logo mg

OpenBSD Mg editor. Portable Public Domain Micro Emacs for *BSD, Cygwin, Linux, Mac OS X.

JOE logo JOE

JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed under the GNU General...
  • mg Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-05
  • JOE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-01

mg videos

MG HS review 2020: Is made in China finally good? We review MG's mid-sized SUV.

More videos:

  • Review - MG HS | Owner's Review: Price, Specs & Features | PakWheels
  • Review - 2021 MG ZS 1.5 A/T Alpha - Car Review

JOE videos

Joe - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Joe Movie Review (Schmoes Know)
  • Review - Barstool Pizza Review - Joe & Pat's Pizzeria

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mg and JOE)
Software Development
33 33%
67% 67
Text Editors
30 30%
70% 70
IDE
32 32%
68% 68
IDEs And Text Editors
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using mg and JOE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JOE seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mg mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of mg yet. Tracking of mg recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JOE mentions (15)

  • Ask HN: Interesting TUIs (text user interfaces), maybe forgotten ones?
    > Unlike emacs or vim or even nano, it didn't have a bunch of invisible shortcut keys, just a Windows-like drop-down menu system (but rendered in DOS). You might like "joe", which was inspired by WordStar: . - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
  • WordStar: Arrogant, Difficult, Powerful (2022)
    I actually have a bound set for WordStar 4. If you want to use something similar on modern systems, try "Joe's Own Editor." https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Micro – A Modern Alternative to Nano
    JOE is pretty nice https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ — a hybrid of WordStar and Emacs, and if you run it with `jstar` you get a pretty authentic WordStar experience which also reminds of the earliest Borland Turbo IDEs. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • RAM requirement for a cyberdeck for writing
    If you want to change your workflow, you might consider using a terminal based text editor though. There are many out there, the most famous being vi or emacs (though both a bit hard to use) and packages specifically for word processing exist as well (for example https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/). It will need more getting used to, but this will pretty much run on a potato and you could use a pi zero or any... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Resolving the Great Undo-Redo Quandary
    JOE [1] has worked this way as long as I remember (which is close to 20 years). [1] https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mg and JOE, you can also consider the following products

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

Micro - Modern terminal-based text editor

GNU Emacs - GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more.

4coder - Minimalist, cross platform, programmable, code editing environment for low level programming.

Visual Studio Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

GNU nano - GNU nano is a small and friendly text editor.