Mettl Online Exams Software

Website

mettl.com

Pricing URL

-

$ Details

-

Platforms

-

Release Date

-

Categories

#Education & Reference #Office & Productivity #Online Services #Tool #Education

CodeSubmit

Website

codesubmit.io

Pricing URL

Official CodeSubmit Pricing

$ Details

paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (15 candidates/month and access to the CodeSubmit library)

Platforms

Web

Release Date

2019 March

Categories

#Candidate Screening And Assessment #Digital Assessments And Tests #Hiring And Recruitment #Hiring Tools #Recruitment

Mettl Online Exams Software features and specs

• Comprehensive Question Bank
  Mettl provides a robust question bank feature that allows instructors to create and manage a wide range of question types, facilitating diverse and comprehensive assessments.
• Advanced Proctoring Technology
  The platform offers advanced proctoring solutions, including AI-powered monitoring and live proctoring options, ensuring the integrity of examinations by preventing cheating.
• Customizable Exam Settings
  Mettl allows for extensive customization of exams, including time limits, question randomization, and access rules, enabling educators to tailor the examination experience to their needs.
• Scalability
  The software is capable of handling a large number of concurrent users, making it suitable for institutions with high-volume assessment requirements.
• Real-time Analytics and Reporting
  Mettl offers real-time data analytics and reporting features that provide insights into candidate performance and examination trends.

Possible disadvantages of Mettl Online Exams Software

• Technical Issues
  Users may occasionally experience technical glitches or connectivity issues, which can disrupt the examination process and lead to frustration for both test administrators and candidates.
• Learning Curve
  New users might face a learning curve when navigating the platform due to its extensive features and options, potentially requiring additional training and support.
• Cost
  The subscription and licensing fees for Mettl can be relatively high, which might be a barrier for smaller institutions or organizations with limited budgets.
• Privacy Concerns
  Some users might have concerns about data privacy and the extent of monitoring during proctored exams, which could affect the acceptance of the platform among test-takers.

CodeSubmit features and specs

• Real-world assessment
  CodeSubmit allows employers to assess candidates using real-world coding assignments, which better evaluates a candidate's practical skills compared to traditional algorithmic quizzes.
• Customizable assessments
  Employers can tailor the coding assignments according to the specific requirements of the job role, providing a more relevant evaluation process.
• Integration with recruiting tools
  CodeSubmit offers integration with popular recruiting tools like Greenhouse and Lever, making it easier to streamline the candidate evaluation process.
• Detailed feedback and insights
  Recruiters and developers can give detailed feedback and gain insights from the candidate's code submissions, helping in making informed hiring decisions.
• Candidate experience
  Candidates benefit from a practical and engaging coding challenge that more accurately reflects their potential day-to-day work, improving their overall experience.

Possible disadvantages of CodeSubmit

• Time-consuming
  Creating and managing customized coding tests can be time-consuming for hiring teams, especially if assessments need to be regularly updated or tailored to different roles.
• Potential for bias
  If not carefully designed, coding assessments might introduce bias, potentially overlooking relevant skills not covered in the test.
• Limited assessment of soft skills
  While CodeSubmit evaluates technical skills effectively, it might not be sufficient to assess a candidate's communication, collaboration, and other soft skills.
• Dependence on resource availability
  For smaller companies, dedicating resources to manage and review coding tests might be challenging amidst other recruitment responsibilities.
• Learning curve for recruiters
  Some recruiters might face a learning curve to fully utilize the platform's features, especially if they are more accustomed to traditional recruitment assessments.