Metalsmith VS Octopress

Metalsmith — the best customizable SSG. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

I use Metalsmith. Been happy with it. I build my site into a self-contained nginx docker image. Source: almost 2 years ago

Const Metalsmith = require('metalsmith') Const markdown = require('@metalsmith/markdown') Const layouts = require('metalsmith-layouts') Const permalinks = require('@metalsmith/permalinks') Const collections = require('metalsmith-collections') Metalsmith(__dirname) .metadata({ sitename: 'Website Name', description: "Website description.", generator: 'Metalsmith', url: 'https://metalsmith.io/' ... Source: almost 2 years ago

A static site generator I've been enjoying lately (and using for my blog) is Metalsmith: https://metalsmith.io/ It feel like it's the best of both worlds, because it's simple to learn and customize, but there are plugins for the things you don't want to spend time writing yourself. For example, I'm using plugins to: check for broken links, generate an RSS feed, and run a test server with automatic reloading. But... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I really like using Metalsmith as a static site generator myself. It's incredibly lightweight and you can extend it in any direction you like if you feel the need. But if you want an out-of-the-box solution, grab something like Gatsby or Hugo. This site has a big list of them. Source: almost 3 years ago

[translated from Traditional Chinese] I think every Octopress user must have such troubles — as the number of articles increases, the speed of file creation becomes slower and slower. This site has grown to 54 articles, and it takes at least one minute to create a file every time. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Jekyll is quite specific for blogs and I think theming or adding/removing features it is not going to be trivial. I remember there was this thing on top of jekyll (octopress) that was just a nightmare to configure, and that was because jekyll was just a very simple tool. Source: about 2 years ago