Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Meson VS Materialize CSS

Compare Meson VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Meson logo Meson

Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Materialize CSS logo Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
  • Meson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-04
  • Materialize CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14

Meson features and specs

  • Speed
    Meson is designed to be fast. It optimizes the build process to ensure efficient and rapid compilation, which can save considerable time in large projects.
  • Ease of Use
    Meson uses a simple syntax that is easy to learn and understand, making it accessible for both new and experienced developers.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Meson supports multiple platforms including Linux, Windows, and macOS, allowing for consistent build processes across different operating systems.
  • Ninja Backend
    Meson uses Ninja as its backend build system, which is known for its efficiency and speed, particularly in incremental builds.
  • Dependency Management
    Meson has built-in support for handling dependencies, making it easier to manage complex projects with multiple libraries.
  • Modern Language Support
    Meson is designed to support modern programming languages such as C, C++, Fortran, and Rust, as well as many others.
  • Extensibility
    Meson allows for custom build definitions and extensions, providing flexibility to address specific needs and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Meson

  • Learning Curve
    While Meson's syntax is simple, there can be a learning curve for developers accustomed to other build systems like CMake or Make.
  • Smaller Community
    Meson has a smaller community compared to more established tools like CMake, which can lead to fewer available resources and third-party modules.
  • Limited IDE Integration
    Although Meson supports several IDEs, the level of integration may not be as comprehensive as that available for more mainstream build systems.
  • Transition Overhead
    Projects transitioning from another build system to Meson may experience some overhead in terms of time and effort needed to reconfigure their build setup.
  • Dependency on Ninja
    Being heavily reliant on the Ninja build system can be a limitation if Ninja is not well-supported or preferred in some environments.

Materialize CSS features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize CSS

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis of Meson

Overall verdict

  • Meson is generally considered a good choice for developers who are looking for a fast and efficient build system. Its ease of use and comprehensive support for various platforms and languages make it a strong alternative to more traditional systems.

Why this product is good

  • Meson is a modern build system that is designed to improve the software development experience. It focuses on speed and ease of use, offering a user-friendly syntax compared to traditional build systems like Make. Meson supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, making it versatile for different projects. It is known for its fast configuration and build times, which can significantly speed up the development process.

Recommended for

    Meson is recommended for developers working on open-source projects, cross-platform applications, or any software that requires a modern and efficient build system. It is especially beneficial for projects where quick iteration and build times are a priority.

Analysis of Materialize CSS

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Meson videos

+ Add

Meson RTA by Newgen Vape - Flavour Banger - Review & Rebuild

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MESON RTA by NEWGEN - Review & Build Tutorial!
  • Review - NewGen Vape Meson RTA Review - ...it's all down to the price...

Materialize CSS videos

+ Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Meson and Materialize CSS)

Meson

Materialize CSS

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Meson and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Meson and Materialize CSS

Meson Reviews

We have no reviews of Meson yet.
Be the first one to post

Materialize CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web browsers, and sometimes it does not handle certain nestings of components properly, resulting in an odd appearance.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with innovations and technology.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a responsive layout based on Bootstrap’s 12-column grid format. The best part? Its extensive color palettes. So, if you want to work with Material Design (Google’s...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
It’s specifically designed to help you develop faster using a standard template and customizable components. As the name suggests, Materialize is based on the basic principles of Material Design.
Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com
10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives
Materialize is a Design-inspired front-end framework that offers everything you need to create beautiful websites and apps. It includes a responsive grid system, CSS components, and animation libraries. Materialize is also easy to use and customizable, making it the perfect choice for any project. Furthermore, a single basic responsive framework across all phases minimizes...
Source: thetechhacker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Meson should be more popular than Materialize CSS. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Meson mentions (44)

  • cargo-c common questions
    With cargo-c I try to use the best practices to support as many platform as possible, trying to stay in sync with what meson does. Sadly what is conceptually trivial, installing a package, has lots of details that are platform-specific. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Rust Without Crates.io
    I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Makefile Tutorial
    Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CMake x make?
    If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: over 1 year ago
  • C++ Papercuts
    I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted): 
        https://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.
    - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Materialize CSS mentions (26)

  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it integrates animations and components to provide feedback to users. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Materialize was created by a team of developers at Google, inspired by the principles of Material Design. Material Design is a design language developed by Google that emphasizes tactile surfaces, realistic lighting, and bold, graphic interfaces. Materialize aims to bring these principles to web development by providing a framework with ready-to-use components and styles based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Took a web development job without much experience, am I doomed?
    If you wanna make it look nice use materialize css works great with Django templates. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best 3 Bootstrap Alternatives
    You can also visit the Materialize website and GitHub repository which currently has garnered over 38k likes and has been forked over 4k times by developers. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • All About Hacktober Fest 2022 You Need To Know
    This repository consists of files required to deploy a Web App or PWA created with Materialize Css. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Meson and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Loading...