Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Meson VS AWS CodeBuild

Compare Meson VS AWS CodeBuild and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Meson logo Meson

Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

AWS CodeBuild logo AWS CodeBuild

Online shopping from the earth's biggest selection of books, magazines, music, DVDs, videos, electronics, computers, software, apparel & accessories, shoes, jewelry, tools & hardware, housewares, furniture, sporting goods, beauty & personal care, br…
  • Meson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-04
  • AWS CodeBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

Meson features and specs

  • Speed
    Meson is designed to be fast. It optimizes the build process to ensure efficient and rapid compilation, which can save considerable time in large projects.
  • Ease of Use
    Meson uses a simple syntax that is easy to learn and understand, making it accessible for both new and experienced developers.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Meson supports multiple platforms including Linux, Windows, and macOS, allowing for consistent build processes across different operating systems.
  • Ninja Backend
    Meson uses Ninja as its backend build system, which is known for its efficiency and speed, particularly in incremental builds.
  • Dependency Management
    Meson has built-in support for handling dependencies, making it easier to manage complex projects with multiple libraries.
  • Modern Language Support
    Meson is designed to support modern programming languages such as C, C++, Fortran, and Rust, as well as many others.
  • Extensibility
    Meson allows for custom build definitions and extensions, providing flexibility to address specific needs and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Meson

  • Learning Curve
    While Meson's syntax is simple, there can be a learning curve for developers accustomed to other build systems like CMake or Make.
  • Smaller Community
    Meson has a smaller community compared to more established tools like CMake, which can lead to fewer available resources and third-party modules.
  • Limited IDE Integration
    Although Meson supports several IDEs, the level of integration may not be as comprehensive as that available for more mainstream build systems.
  • Transition Overhead
    Projects transitioning from another build system to Meson may experience some overhead in terms of time and effort needed to reconfigure their build setup.
  • Dependency on Ninja
    Being heavily reliant on the Ninja build system can be a limitation if Ninja is not well-supported or preferred in some environments.

AWS CodeBuild features and specs

  • Fully Managed
    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service. Users do not need to worry about provisioning, managing, and scaling their own build servers.
  • Scalability
    CodeBuild automatically scales up and down to meet the demands of your build process, ensuring that builds are completed quickly without manual intervention.
  • Pay-as-You-Go Pricing
    Users only pay for the compute time they consume with CodeBuild, making it a cost-effective solution for many developer teams.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3, EC2, and CloudWatch, providing a cohesive environment for your development and deployment pipelines.
  • Custom Environment Support
    Users can define their own build environments with custom Docker images, providing flexibility to meet specific build requirements.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeBuild

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    Setting up projects in CodeBuild can be complex for users who are new to AWS or continuous integration services.
  • Limited Local Testing
    Unlike some CI tools, AWS CodeBuild provides limited options for running builds locally before pushing changes, which can hinder testing processes.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with AWS services may face a steep learning curve when first using CodeBuild as it involves understanding several AWS concepts and configurations.
  • Potential Costs at Scale
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for small workloads, costs can accumulate significantly as usage scales up if not managed carefully.
  • Configuration Management
    Managing build spec files and environment configurations can become complex, especially in projects with many different build processes.

Meson videos

+ Add

Meson RTA by Newgen Vape - Flavour Banger - Review & Rebuild

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MESON RTA by NEWGEN - Review & Build Tutorial!
  • Review - NewGen Vape Meson RTA Review - ...it's all down to the price...

AWS CodeBuild videos

+ Add

AWS CodeBuild Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - AWS CodeBuild Overview
  • Review - All the AWS CodeBuild You Can Stomach in 45 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Meson and AWS CodeBuild)

Meson

AWS CodeBuild

Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
Continuous Integration
38 38%
Continuous Integration
62% 62
JavaScript Package Manager
100 100%
JavaScript Package Manager
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Meson and AWS CodeBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Meson should be more popular than AWS CodeBuild. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Meson mentions (44)

  • cargo-c common questions
    With cargo-c I try to use the best practices to support as many platform as possible, trying to stay in sync with what meson does. Sadly what is conceptually trivial, installing a package, has lots of details that are platform-specific. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Rust Without Crates.io
    I went to mesonbuild.org and it doesn't match the description (some sort of betting site? I didn't stick around ...), and a search turned up: https://mesonbuild.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Makefile Tutorial
    Came here to post the same. The answer for How to build software? is Meson[1] for C and C++ and also other languages. Works well on Windows and Mac, too. I’ve written a small Makefile to learn the basic and backgrounds. Make is fine. But the next high-level would have been Autotools, which is an intimidating and weird set of tools. Most new stuff written in C/C++ use now Meson and it feels sane. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CMake x make?
    If you are very fortunate, you'll be able to choose something else. I like meson myself: it looks a bit like python, it's popular, small, simple, well-documented, easy to install and update, and it works well everywhere. Source: over 1 year ago
  • C++ Papercuts
    I suggest changing the build tool. Meson improved C and C++ a lot: https://mesonbuild.com/ The dependency declaration and auto-detection is nice. But the hidden extra is WrapDB, built-in package management (if wanted): 
        https://mesonbuild.com/Wrap-dependency-system-manual.html.
    - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

AWS CodeBuild mentions (13)

  • Low Cost "Overkill" AWS Infrastructure for a Newborn Startup
    Therefore, I used AWS Codebuild and AWS CodePipeline to automate the steps of building and deploying the services. The diagram below depicts all the steps required to continuously deliver the frontend and backend applications:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How CodeCatalyst compares to other AWS Services related to Development and CI/CD processes
    We treat these services in one  group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Well-Architected Review - Part II - Operational Excellence
    Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS - Multi Environment deployments - Part 2
    AWS CodeBuild: fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DEVOPS AS A SERVICE
    AWS CodeBuild is a completely managed service for compiling code, testing quality assurance using automated procedures, and generating software ready for deployment. CodeBuild is incredibly secure, as each client receives a unique set of encryption keys to include in each created artifact. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Meson and AWS CodeBuild, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Loading...