Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

memcached VS Amazon S3

Compare memcached VS Amazon S3 and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Amazon S3 logo Amazon S3

Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Amazon S3 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-01

Amazon S3 (Amazon Simple Storage Service) is the storage platform by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides an object storage with high availability, low latency and high durability. S3 can store any type of object and can serve as storage for internet applications, backups, disaster recovery, data archives, big data sets and multimedia.

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

Amazon S3 features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon S3 automatically scales storage resources to meet user demands, enabling businesses to store a virtually unlimited amount of data without worrying about capacity constraints.
  • Durability
    Amazon S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 9's) durability, ensuring that your data is highly protected against loss and corruption.
  • Security
    Amazon S3 offers robust security features, including encryption at rest and in transit, fine-grained access controls, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).
  • Integrations
    Amazon S3 integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as EC2, Lambda, and RDS, as well as third-party applications, facilitating a cohesive cloud environment.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    Amazon S3 offers a range of storage classes, allowing users to optimize costs based on their access patterns, from frequently accessed data to long-term archival storage.
  • Global Availability
    Amazon S3 is available in multiple regions worldwide, providing low latency and high availability for users around the globe.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon S3

  • Complexity
    The wide array of features and configurations in Amazon S3 can be overwhelming for beginners, requiring a steep learning curve and careful planning.
  • Cost Predictability
    Although cost-effective, the pricing model of Amazon S3 can be complex due to various factors such as storage volume, data transfer rates, and request frequency, leading to unpredictable costs if not monitored closely.
  • Performance Variation
    While generally offering high performance, the speed of data retrieval from Amazon S3 can vary based on factors like object size, storage class, and region, potentially affecting time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Migration Tools
    Although Amazon provides data migration services, some users find the migration tools and processes cumbersome, especially when moving large volumes of data from other storage solutions.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Amazon S3 and other AWS services can make it difficult to switch providers or develop a multi-cloud strategy, leading to potential vendor lock-in concerns.

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

Amazon S3 videos

Introduction to Amazon S3

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with Amazon S3 - AWS Online Tech Talks
  • Review - Amazon S3 Review: Amazon S3
  • Review - Amazon S3 Glacier Cloud Storage: What You Need to Know
  • Review - Wasabi vs. Amazon S3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to memcached and Amazon S3)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using memcached and Amazon S3. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare memcached and Amazon S3

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

Amazon S3 Reviews

Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Amazon S3 is suitable for applications of any size requiring reliable and scalable storage.
Source: signoz.io
Best Top 12 MEGA Alternatives in 2024
Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) is an object storage service with industry-leading scalability, data availability, security, and performance. The service is particularly suitable for enterprise users to manage collect, store, protect, back-up, retrieve, and analyze data.
7 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Amazon S3 is short for Amazon Simple Storage Service, a popular web hosting company among developers that also offers object storage service.
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Amazon S3 is referred to as Amazon Simple Storage Service. It is basically a cloud storage service that was initially released in 2006. This product of Amazon Web Services (AWS) handles big data analytics, provides online data backups and helps in web-scale computing.
What are the alternatives to S3?
Sometimes Amazon S3 might not be serving you as you need and need some features or want to move out of the big 3 providers due to charges of which you’re not using much of their services. There are many alternatives to object storage that you can use at a far lower cost than what you pay on Amazon S3. And storing data traditionally can become complicated sometimes, whereby...
Source: www.w6d.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon S3 should be more popular than memcached. It has been mentiond 197 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

Amazon S3 mentions (197)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing memcached and Amazon S3, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service