Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

McAfee Network Security Platform VS runc

Compare McAfee Network Security Platform VS runc and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

McAfee Network Security Platform logo McAfee Network Security Platform

McAfee Network Security Platform guards all your network-connected devices from zero-day and other attacks, with a cost-effective network intrusion prevention system.

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc
  • McAfee Network Security Platform Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21

McAfee Network Security Platform features and specs

  • Comprehensive Threat Detection
    McAfee Network Security Platform provides in-depth monitoring and detection of a wide array of network threats, utilizing advanced algorithms and machine learning to detect anomalies and potential intrusions effectively.
  • Scalability
    The platform can be scaled to accommodate various network sizes, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises that require extensive network security measures.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It offers real-time monitoring capabilities that allow network administrators to respond swiftly to potential threats, minimizing the time between detection and action.
  • Integration with McAfee Ecosystem
    The platform integrates seamlessly with other McAfee security products, offering a cohesive security environment for businesses already using McAfee solutions.
  • User-friendly Interface
    It features an intuitive interface that simplifies the management and deployment of network security measures, making it accessible even for users with less technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of McAfee Network Security Platform

  • High Cost
    The McAfee Network Security Platform can be expensive, particularly for small businesses or organizations with limited budgets, which might find the cost of acquisition and maintenance to be a barrier.
  • Resource Intensive
    The platform may require significant computational resources and bandwidth, which can be a challenge for organizations with limited infrastructure capacity.
  • Complex Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration of the platform can be complex and time-consuming, requiring expertise and possibly necessitating professional services or extensive training.
  • Potential for False Positives
    Like many intrusion prevention systems, there is a risk of false positives, which can lead to unnecessary alerts and administrative burden as legitimate activities might be flagged as potential threats.
  • Dependency on McAfee Products
    While integration with McAfee products is a pro, it can also be a con for organizations that do not wish to be locked into a single vendor ecosystem.

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

McAfee Network Security Platform videos

No McAfee Network Security Platform videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

runc videos

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to McAfee Network Security Platform and runc)
Cyber Security
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using McAfee Network Security Platform and runc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, runc seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

McAfee Network Security Platform mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of McAfee Network Security Platform yet. Tracking of McAfee Network Security Platform recommendations started around Mar 2021.

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing McAfee Network Security Platform and runc, you can also consider the following products

Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention System (NGIPS) - Cisco Firepower NGIPS (Next-Generation IPS) provides contextual awareness, security intelligence, and advanced threat protection against attacks and malware.

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

snort - Snort is a free and open source network intrusion prevention system.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Suricata - Suricata is a high performance Network IDS, IPS and Network Security Monitoring engine.

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.