Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Material Dashboard VS Google Open Source

Compare Material Dashboard VS Google Open Source and see what are their differences

Material Dashboard logo Material Dashboard

A free bootstrap admin built on top of Material Kit

Google Open Source logo Google Open Source

All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella
  • Material Dashboard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-09
  • Google Open Source Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

Material Dashboard features and specs

  • User-friendly Design
    Material Dashboard adopts the Material Design principles, which offer a clean and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate and interact with the dashboard elements.
  • Responsive Layout
    The dashboard is fully responsive, ensuring it performs well and looks good across various devices and screen sizes, enhancing the usability for mobile users.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Material Dashboard comes with a wide range of components and plugins such as charts, forms, and tables, which can cater to different application needs and improve functionality.
  • Customizability
    It provides customization options allowing developers to easily tweak styles and components to fit the specific requirements of their projects.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Material Dashboard is freely available and can be used for commercial projects without any licensing costs, with a supportive community for assistance.

Possible disadvantages of Material Dashboard

  • Dependency on Material Design
    Since the dashboard heavily relies on Material Design, any updates or changes to these guidelines may require significant adjustments in the dashboard layout and components.
  • Potential Overhead
    For smaller projects, the plethora of features and components might be overkill, introducing unnecessary complexity and overhead in the development process.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve in understanding and effectively utilizing all the features and components provided, particularly if they are unfamiliar with Material Design.
  • Limited Native Themes
    While highly customizable, the dashboard offers limited native themes, which might require additional effort to create a unique aesthetic without extensive custom styling.
  • Performance Concerns
    Including numerous third-party plugins and features might lead to performance issues if not managed properly, potentially affecting the loading times and responsiveness of the application.

Google Open Source features and specs

  • Community Support
    Google Open Source projects often have large, active communities that contribute to the software's development and provide support.
  • Innovation
    Google frequently publishes cutting-edge projects, allowing developers to utilize the latest in technology and innovation.
  • Quality Documentation
    Google Open Source projects generally come with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize their tools.
  • Scalability
    Many of Google's open-source projects are designed to scale efficiently, benefiting from Google's extensive experience in handling large-scale systems.
  • Integration with Other Google Services
    Open-source projects from Google often integrate smoothly with other Google services and platforms, providing a cohesive ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Google Open Source

  • Dependency on Google
    Being tied to Google ecosystems might lead to dependencies, making it harder for developers to switch to other alternatives.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Some developers are wary of data privacy issues when using tools developed by Google, given the company's history with data collection.
  • Complexity
    Google’s projects can sometimes be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with their systems and methodologies.
  • Licensing Issues
    Open-source licensing can sometimes pose challenges, especially for companies trying to ensure compliance with multiple licensing requirements.
  • Longevity and Support
    Not all Google open-source projects have long-term support, and there is a risk that some projects may be abandoned or shelved.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Material Dashboard and Google Open Source)
Developer Tools
37 37%
63% 63
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
27 27%
73% 73
Web App
49 49%
51% 51

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Dashboard and Google Open Source. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Open Source seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Material Dashboard mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Material Dashboard yet. Tracking of Material Dashboard recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Google Open Source mentions (22)

  • Revolutionizing Blockchain and Open Source Funding: Microfunding and Project Funding Alternatives
    Sponsorship Programs: Platforms such as GitHub Sponsors and offerings from tech giants like Google Open Source and Microsoft Open Source provide recurring support while maintaining community values. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Funding Open Source Software: Sustaining the Backbone of Modern Digital Innovation
    As digital economies matured, the limitations of relying solely on volunteer support became apparent. Numerous OSS projects found that a lack of steady revenue streams led to developer burnout, limited maintenance, and even stagnation. Today, the OSS landscape has evolved to incorporate a blend of funding methods that include individual donations for open source projects, crowdfunding via platforms like GitHub... - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Open Source Funding: Strategies, Case Studies, and Best Practices
    Corporate sponsorship is a stable source of funding where companies invest directly in projects crucial to their operations. Examples include initiatives under Microsoft Open Source and Google Open Source. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Navigating Innovation and Regulation: How the Trump Administration Shaped Open Source Policy
    Beyond federal systems, the Trump administration’s policies resonated within the private sector, where companies like Google continue to drive innovation using open source platforms. Reduced government intervention and a focus on intellectual property rights created an environment where private firms had the freedom to innovate while carefully navigating the tension between open collaboration and proprietary... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Mastering the Money Matters of Open Source: Navigating the Financial Landscape
    Corporate Support – Tech giants like Google and Microsoft often contribute resources, funding, and developer expertise. Their involvement not only adds financial stability but also helps legitimize and amplify the project within the broader tech community. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Material Dashboard and Google Open Source, you can also consider the following products

Dashboard UI Kit - A modern & responsive dashboard UI kit for designers.

Code NASA - 253 NASA open source software projects

Infinity Dashboard - A beautiful way to keep track of anything you want 📊

Disney Open Source - Explore Disney's Open Source projects

Stripe Dashboard - Activate the preview of the refreshed Dashboard now

LaunchKit - Open Source - A popular suite of developer tools, now 100% open source.