Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MASSCAN VS Webhook.site

Compare MASSCAN VS Webhook.site and see what are their differences

MASSCAN logo MASSCAN

This is the fastest Internet port scanner.

Webhook.site logo Webhook.site

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
  • MASSCAN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • Webhook.site Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-30

With Webhook.site, you instantly get a unique, random URL and e-mail address that you can use to test and debug Webhooks, HTTP requests and emails, as well as to create your own workflows using the Custom Actions graphical editor or WebhookScript–a simple scripting language, to transform, validate and process HTTP requests.

What are people using it for?

  • Receive Webhooks without needing an internet-facing Web server
  • Send Webhooks to a server that's behind a firewall or private subnet
  • Transforming Webhooks into other formats, and re-sending them to different systems
  • Connect different APIs that aren't compatible
  • Building contact forms that send emails
  • Instantly build APIs without needing infrastructure

Native integrations include:

  • Google Sheets
  • Dropbox
  • Discord
  • Slack
  • AWS S3 and CloudFront
  • SSH
  • FTP(S)

MASSCAN

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Webhook.site

$ Details
freemium $14.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser REST API Cross Platform Python Windows Mac OSX Linux Command Line Interface
Release Date
2016 March

MASSCAN videos

Tool Review - Masscan (Scan the whole internet)

More videos:

  • Review - SCANNING AT SCALE (masscan, nmap, axiom, recon.dev)

Webhook.site videos

Webhook.site Custom Actions Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MASSCAN and Webhook.site)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MASSCAN and Webhook.site. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MASSCAN and Webhook.site

MASSCAN Reviews

15 Best Nmap Alternatives Network Security Scanner
Masscan has a capacity of as much as 1.6 million packets per second on its Linux version. That is not all, Masscan can scale up to a hundred million packets per second on a computer that is rigged with eight 10 Gpbs installed cards that run on PF RING driver.
Alternatives to Nmap: from simple to advanced network scanning
By default, Masscan’s scan rate is 100,000 packets-per-second. The macOS or Windows version of this tool can be set to 300,000 packets-per-second. On Linux, Masscan can do 1.6 million packets-per-second. But it can scan up to 100 million packets-per-second on a computer rigged with eight 10-Gbps network cards installed in it and running the PF_RING driver.

Webhook.site Reviews

We have no reviews of Webhook.site yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webhook.site should be more popular than MASSCAN. It has been mentiond 68 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MASSCAN mentions (27)

  • Mass Scanning
    Can I get banned for mass scanning with https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan or does it slow down any other vms from other persons? Source: 12 months ago
  • Has anyone ever had their homelab or network hacked? What happened?
    Nope, this doesn't work any more. Shodan checks all ports (so any attackers using data from Shodan already know which ports you have open), and tools like masscan (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan) let you portscan the entire IPv4 address space in less than 10 minutes. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Private server intruded
    The discord user at the time used the tool "Masscan" to scan every 25565 port on the internet, he claims he was able to get the entire internet scanned in just a few minutes with a 512MB buyvm slice. Source: about 1 year ago
  • My home server is frustrating me. Please help me, home server wizards.
    Changing the default port does nothing for security. It only prevents some basic brute force or default password scripts. Anyone is able to scan for it in no time anyway (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Should I be Concerned?
    But it should blow away the far-too-common belief that no-one's after you because you're not interesting enough. IPv4 is smaller than we think. It is not difficult to scan the entire ipv4 space in minutes. And every single one of those is going to knock your door on the way past. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

Webhook.site mentions (68)

  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    Webhook.site - Verify webhooks, outbound HTTP requests, or emails with a custom URL. A temporary URL and email address are always free. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Spring Cloud Config, Spring Cloud Bus & Kafka | How to set up automatic updates of your configuration
    The automatic updates use webhooks from version control system platforms such as GitHub and GitLab. In this article, for correct working, the services should be deployed somewhere, like Cloud Platform Providers, but to keep things simple, we will do it on a local machine. You can create a webhook inside the repository’s settings section and get an idea of what information can be obtained from the webhook... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Developer’s Guide: working with webhooks on your localhost
    While inspecting the content of a webhook payload can be useful (for example by forwarding the webhook to tools like webhook.site), developers also require the capability to receive incoming webhooks directly in the application running on their laptop. It is a matter of more effective testing that verifies the correct processing on the incoming events and the associated workflow that follows. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Best way to handle webhooks from Woo-Advanced
    The webhook fires natively from inside the site, it's Yith Subscription plugin. I can get the webhook out and see the information if I test on a place like webhook.site. Everything works fine there. Source: 5 months ago
  • Building a Robust Webhook Service with Golang: A Comprehensive Guide
    With the Dockerfile written we can now start the docker containers, but first, you need to have a webhook URL to try this project. You can easily get a free one at https://webhook.site. Once it is done, create a file called .env at the root of the project, where the docker-compose.yaml file is present. Then, make sure to have similar content. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MASSCAN and Webhook.site, you can also consider the following products

Nmap - Nmap Free Security Scanner, Port Scanner, & Network Exploration Tool. Download open source software for Linux, Windows, UNIX, FreeBSD, etc.

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Advanced IP Scanner - Advanced IP Scanner shows all network devices, gives you access to shared folders, and can even remotely switch computers off. Download it Free.

MockServer - Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.

Angry IP Scanner - Open-source and cross-platform network scanner designed to be fast and simple to use

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients