Marker.io

Website

marker.io

Pricing URL

Official Marker.io Pricing

$ Details

paid Free Trial $49.0 / Monthly (Up to 5 Users, Unlimited Integrations, Unlimited feedback)

Platforms

Browser Chrome OS Firefox Safari

Release Date

2017 June

Categories

#Web Development Tools #Visual Feeback #Visual Bug Reports #Error Tracking #Bug Trackers #QA #Feedback Widgets #Website Testing #Website Screenshots

PullRequest.com

Website

pullrequest.com

Pricing URL

Official PullRequest.com Pricing

$ Details

paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)

Platforms

iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

Release Date

-

Categories

#Code Review #Developer Tools #Tech #Code Coverage #Code Quality

Marker.io features and specs

• Ease of Use
  Marker.io's user interface is intuitive, making it simple for users to capture feedback and report bugs directly from their browser.
• Integration Capabilities
  It seamlessly integrates with popular project management tools like Jira, Trello, Asana, GitHub, and more, allowing smooth workflow continuity.
• Visual Feedback
  Users can easily annotate screenshots to provide clear and visual feedback, which improves the quality and efficiency of reported issues.
• Real-time Collaboration
  The tool supports real-time collaboration, enabling team members to work together instantly on reported issues.
• Browser Extensions
  Browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, and others provide convenience, making it easy to capture and report bugs directly from any web page.
• Automated Capture Details
  Automatically captures technical details about the user's environment (e.g., browser version, OS), which helps in diagnosing issues faster.

Possible disadvantages of Marker.io

• Cost
  The pricing can be high for small teams or freelancers, especially when scaling the number of users.
• Limited Customization
  While it integrates well with many tools, customization options within Marker.io itself can sometimes be limited, which may not fit all workflows.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  While basic functionalities are easy to use, there can be a learning curve to leverage more advanced features effectively.
• Dependency on Third-Party Tools
  Heavy reliance on integrations means that any issues or limitations in the third-party tools can affect Marker.io's functionality.
• Internet Dependency
  As a cloud-based solution, an active internet connection is required to capture and report bugs, which can be a limitation in offline scenarios.
• Subscription Model
  The subscription-based pricing model may not be feasible for all users, and there's no one-time purchase option.

PullRequest.com features and specs

• Expert Code Reviewers
  PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
• Improved Code Quality
  By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
• Scalability
  The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
• Time-Saving
  Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
• Objective Feedback
  External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

• Cost
  Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
• Security Concerns
  Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
• Integration Overhead
  Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
• Variable Quality
  While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
• Limited Context
  External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Product tour

No PullRequest.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video