Software Alternatives & Reviews

MangoApps VS Ziflow

Compare MangoApps VS Ziflow and see what are their differences

MangoApps logo MangoApps

Founded in 2007, MangoSpring transforms the way teams work together.

Ziflow logo Ziflow

Online Proofing software from Ziflow keeps teams connected and collaborating by providing a single source of truth for creative review and approval.
  • MangoApps Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11
  • Ziflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04

Ziflow's enterprise online proofing software helps deliver marketing projects faster by streamlining the review and approval of creative content. Developed by the founders of ProofHQ, Ziflow is the industry's leading enterprise-ready standalone online proofing solution, designed for agencies and brands.

MangoApps videos

Product Review: MangoApps

More videos:

  • Review - University Of Illinois - MangoApps Review
  • Review - What is MangoApps?

Ziflow videos

How to review a proof in Ziflow online proofing

More videos:

  • Review - Reviewing creative content with Ziflow Online Proofing
  • Review - Introducing Ziflow Online Proofing

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MangoApps and Ziflow)
Project Management
36 36%
64% 64
Task Management
100 100%
0% 0
Online Proofing
0 0%
100% 100
Communication
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using MangoApps and Ziflow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MangoApps and Ziflow

MangoApps Reviews

We have no reviews of MangoApps yet.
Be the first one to post

Ziflow Reviews

  1. Improved Creative Workflow

    We were in the 'stone age' before Ziflow - we were using email, dropbox and a project management platform to collect feedback on creative files/projects - it was a nightmare to manage. Ziflow helps streamline this process, and much more. Some features we love include... Ziflow accepts so many different creative file types (we haven't found any they don't accept). Workflows with automated stages make sure we have the right people reviewing at the right time. Security was important to our company, and Ziflow goes well beyond what the competitors offer. Customer support is great - if we ever have questions or problems they quickly respond and address.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Proof HQ
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Online proofing|Collaboration|Great customer support|Highly customizable
  2. Review & approve any creative file

    I've tried other online proofing software but Ziflow is head and shoulders above the others. It's a bit more money than some of the other cheaper proofing solutions but you certainly get you money's worth with features and customer support.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Proof HQ
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Great customer support|Customer support|Easy to use|Secure

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MangoApps and Ziflow, you can also consider the following products

Jostle - A new kind of employee intranet that drives engagement & workplace culture. Achieves social participation in work relevant way. Participation rates are over 85%.

ReviewStudio - ReviewStudio is an online proofing software built for easy collaboration on review and approval workflows, for all your image, video, web pages and PDF based projects.

Bitrix24 - Bitrix24 is a free (for small businesses) social enterprise platform. It is a united work space which handles the many aspects of daily operations and tasks. Create your own social intranet in minutes!

PageProof - Online proofing of anything and everything, made simple. Streamline feedback for easy collaboration, secure workflows, and faster approvals. PageProof. The smarter way to review.

Yammer - Yammer is a leading enterprise social network used by more than 200,000 companies worldwide, including 85% of the Fortune 500, to get work done smarter and faster. Sign Up Today.

Proof HQ - ProofHQ provides a medium for co-workers to annotate and collaborate before producing a clean, finished output.