Mailjet VS Launchpad.net

Mailjet Reviews

Launchpad.net Reviews

Mailjet mentions (4)

• Building a (Virtual) Events Site

  MailJet is a recent addition to the site. Mailing lists can get very expensive. In fact, the mailing list was by far the single most expensive item on this list but Mailjet helped with that. I started with Mailchimp, but they made pricing changes that made it incredibly expensive (for example, charging you for folks you can't communicate with because they unsubscribed). I then went to ActiveCampaign, which I used... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Adding a Mailing List Subscription with Mailjet and Netlify Functions

  I moved from Mailchimp some years back because the cost was going to be a major burden, especially once they changed how they calculate their pricing (anyone you've been in contact with, even if they are unsubscribed and you aren't allowed to communicate with them, counts against your cap). At the time, ActiveCampaign was a cheaper but still full featured option. However, I never really needed all the features... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• What's everyone working on this week (9/2023)?

  I also would like to plug mailjet.com. I added email this week and I wanted an email provider with that ticked the following boxes:. Source: about 1 year ago

• How does your SaaS handle transactional vs promotional emails?

  Email is hard. I spent a couple of days trying to figure out what would be a good fit for Disk Notifier. In the end, I settled for Mailjet. They showed leadership with creating MJML (an email template language) and support transactional email well. They also have a GUI for creating emails and a free tier. Source: over 2 years ago

Launchpad.net mentions (64)

• Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines

  I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives

  You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives

  As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Firefox Developer Edition and Beta: Try Out Mozilla's .deb Package

  There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Fedora Workstation 39

  Https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa A quick google will find plenty of sites telling you how to adjust the package versioning priorities to keep the MozillaTeam version of FF preferred over the crappy snap one. I still use Ubuntu desktop as my daily driver and server OS, and we have zero snaps installed on any of our systems. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago