Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

M for iOS VS ForceTLS

Compare M for iOS VS ForceTLS and see what are their differences

CobbleStone Software
Managing contracts just got easier with CobbleStone! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

M for iOS logo M for iOS

Email app with automatic encryption

ForceTLS logo ForceTLS

ForceTLS allows web sites to tell Firefox that they should be served via HTTPS in the future; this...
Not present
  • ForceTLS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-06

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to M for iOS and ForceTLS)

M for iOS

ForceTLS

Chrome Extensions
38 38%
Chrome Extensions
62% 62
Photos
32 32%
Photos
68% 68
Web Browsers
29 29%
Web Browsers
71% 71
Messaging
100 100%
Messaging
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using M for iOS and ForceTLS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing M for iOS and ForceTLS, you can also consider the following products

HTTPS Everywhere - Chrome extension that encrypts and secures your browser

SSL Enforcer - SSL Enforcer - Force SSL/TLS encryption for any browser or app. Block all unsecure connections.

Smart HTTPS - Automatically changes HTTP addresses to the secure HTTPS, and if loading encounters error, reverts...

Pithos - pithos is a daemon which provides an S3-compatible frontend for storing files in a Cassandra cluster.

Keybase Chat - End-to-end encrypted chat built into Keybase

HTTPZ - HTTPZ is meant to be unobtrusive and lightweight.

Loading...