Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Luxa CSS VS Shoelace.css

Compare Luxa CSS VS Shoelace.css and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Luxa CSS logo Luxa CSS

A minimalist CSS framework.

Shoelace.css logo Shoelace.css

A back to the basics CSS starter kit.
  • Luxa CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-02
  • Shoelace.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03

Luxa CSS features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Shoelace.css features and specs

  • Customizable
    Shoelace.css is built using modern Web Components, allowing for easy customization and theming with CSS Variables, ensuring that developers can tailor components to their specific needs.
  • Compatibility
    Shoelace.css is designed to be framework-agnostic and works seamlessly with various JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, providing flexibility in integration.
  • Responsive Design
    The library provides components that are inherently responsive, which helps in building applications that look good on both desktop and mobile devices without additional effort.
  • Accessibility
    Components in Shoelace.css are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring that applications are usable by people with disabilities and compliant with accessibility standards.
  • Modern Standards
    Being based on Web Components, Shoelace.css makes use of modern web standards, which promotes future-proofing and compatibility with upcoming web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Shoelace.css

  • Size
    As a component library, Shoelace.css might introduce additional size to your project, which can be a concern for applications where performance and load times are critical.
  • Browser Support
    Since it uses Web Components, Shoelace.css may require polyfills for older browsers that do not fully support these technologies, potentially increasing the complexity of deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with Web Components or the concept of using framework-agnostic components might need some time to understand and effectively use Shoelace.css.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more established component libraries, Shoelace.css might have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources, which could make finding support and solutions to issues more challenging.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While highly customizable, Shoelace.css might lack some of the advanced, built-in functionalities found in larger, more comprehensive UI frameworks.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Luxa CSS and Shoelace.css)

Luxa CSS

Shoelace.css

Developer Tools
28 28%
Developer Tools
72% 72
CSS Framework
100 100%
CSS Framework
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
GitHub
100 100%
GitHub
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Luxa CSS and Shoelace.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Luxa CSS and Shoelace.css

Luxa CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Luxa CSS is a minimalist's choice for a framework like Bootstrap and a Bootstrap competitor. It is extremely lightweight and can be easily implemented in any modern development environment. Built from scratch using Sass and JavaScript, Luxa features a simple modifier system, such as .has-dflex, and straightforward class names like .lx-btn or .lx-row.
Source: coursesity.com
10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives
Luxa CSS framework is a minimalist’s dream since it is extremely light and readily implemented in any environment. Luxa comprises a simple modifier system, such as .has-dflex and basic class names like .lx-btn and .lx-row. Luxa is a lightweight and fast CSS framework created for quick development. It offers everything you need to quickly create beautiful websites, including...
Source: thetechhacker.com

Shoelace.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Shoelace.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Shoelace.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Luxa CSS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Luxa CSS yet. Tracking of Luxa CSS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Shoelace.css mentions (25)

  • Show HN: Cs16.css – CSS library based on CS 1.6 UI
    Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... Usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framework is not going to work. It seems that you are not using a frontend framework like Vue.js. So I would recommend a library using web components for the interactivity. One good... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    Can webcomponents be trivially used with HTMX? Like for example: https://shoelace.style/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Do You Need to SSR Your Web Components?
    I created a simple example with a bunch of Shoelace components where they are being lazy-loaded from a CDN. I loaded the components this way to show worst-case-scenario loading performance. As you can see, it still loads quite quickly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You Should Be Shipping a Manifest with Your Web Components
    A recent example of this was when I was helping a team get up and running with Shoelace in a Next.js application. Shoelace provides react wrappers, but they were throwing an error when Next.js tried to server-side render them. Fortunately, Shoelace ships their CEM, so I was able to use it to generate new wrappers that were SSR-safe. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Web Components Are Okay
    I've yet to see this go wrong in practice. The kinds of components that are worth publishing as web components are often large, non-trivial components. Eg media libraries, emoji pickers (like the one made by this article's author), chatbox interfaces, and so on. They are the kinds of things you only have a limited number of on your page. If a component is small and focused in scope, it's likely either written in... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Luxa CSS and Shoelace.css, you can also consider the following products

Lit CSS Framework - World's smallest responsive CSS framework (398 bytes!)

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS

Bulma - Bulma is an open source CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass. It's 100% responsive, fully modular, and available for free.

CSSGradient.io - As a free css gradient generator tool, this website lets you create a colorful gradient background for your website, blog, or social media profile.

Spectre.css - Lightweight, responsive and modern CSS framework for faster and extensible development.

Loading...