Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

luckyBackup VS Back In Time

Compare luckyBackup VS Back In Time and see what are their differences

luckyBackup logo luckyBackup

LuckyBackup is an application that backs-up and/or synchronizes any directories with the power of...

Back In Time logo Back In Time

Back In Time is a simple backup tool for Linux inspired from ...
  • luckyBackup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-12
  • Back In Time Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-11

luckyBackup features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    luckyBackup offers a straightforward and intuitive graphical user interface that makes it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise, allowing easy setup and management of backup tasks.
  • Flexibility and Customization
    The software provides users with a wide range of customization options for their backup operations, including scheduling, inclusion/exclusion rules, and different types of sync options, which cater to both simple and complex backup needs.
  • Simplicity of Installation
    luckyBackup is available through various Linux distribution repositories, making installation straightforward and hassle-free for users on those systems.
  • Safety Feature
    It includes a 'simulation' mode that allows users to preview the results of a backup task without making any actual changes to the files, thus ensuring data safety before a full execution.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source project, it allows users to modify and improve the software to better suit their needs and assures them that the software is free of charge.

Possible disadvantages of luckyBackup

  • Linux Centric
    While luckyBackup can be used on other operating systems through workarounds, its primary focus is on Linux environments, limiting its utility for users on Windows or macOS seeking native support.
  • Lacks Advanced Features
    Though it accomplishes basic backup tasks competently, luckyBackup lacks some advanced features found in other solutions, such as integrated cloud backups or sophisticated encryption options.
  • Dependency on rsync
    luckyBackup relies heavily on rsync for its operations. Any limitations or issues in rsync could directly affect luckyBackup's performance and reliability.
  • Minimal Documentation
    Some users may find the available documentation lacking in depth or detail for troubleshooting more complex scenarios or customization requests.

Back In Time features and specs

  • Open Source
    Back In Time is an open-source software project, allowing anyone to view, modify, and contribute to its source code, which promotes transparency and community-driven development.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features a straightforward and intuitive interface that makes it accessible for users of different skill levels to configure and manage their backups efficiently.
  • Incremental Backups
    Back In Time supports incremental backups, meaning that only changes made since the last backup are saved, which saves time and storage space.
  • Scheduling
    The software offers detailed scheduling options, allowing users to automate their backup processes at specified intervals, which enhances convenience and ensures data is regularly backed up.
  • Configurable
    Back In Time allows for extensive configuration options to suit individual needs, such as setting up multiple backup profiles, filtering files and directories, and defining backup interval details.

Possible disadvantages of Back In Time

  • Limited Platform Support
    Back In Time is primarily designed for Linux, which might limit its usability for users on other operating systems like Windows or macOS.
  • Dependency on rsync
    The tool relies on rsync for data transfer, which may not be available or may require additional configuration on some systems, potentially posing a barrier for users less familiar with command-line tools.
  • Lack of Cloud Integration
    While it supports local and external drive backups, Back In Time does not offer direct integration with popular cloud storage services, which may be a drawback for those looking for cloud-based backup solutions.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    Depending on system resources and the size of data being backed up, Back In Time could introduce performance overhead during backup processes, which might be noticeable for users with limited hardware capabilities.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic use is straightforward, some of the more advanced features and configurations may have a steep learning curve for users not familiar with backup solutions, requiring a deeper understanding to implement effectively.

Analysis of Back In Time

Overall verdict

  • Back In Time is generally considered a good option for users who need a simple and effective backup solution on Linux. It is well-suited for both beginners and experienced users who want a no-fuss application to secure their files.

Why this product is good

  • Back In Time is a simple, easy-to-use backup application for Linux systems. It provides a straightforward graphical user interface, and its use of rsync and hard links makes it efficient in terms of storage. The tool allows for automated backups at regular intervals, making it a reliable option for safeguarding data.

Recommended for

  • Linux users looking for a simple backup solution
  • Individuals who want automated, scheduled backups
  • Users who prefer a graphical user interface
  • People with storage constraints who need an efficient backup tool

luckyBackup videos

No luckyBackup videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Back In Time videos

Back to the Future: Back in Time Review - with Tom Vasel

More videos:

  • Review - Back in Time Review - App Reviews
  • Review - Solareyn's Review - Sonic Back in Time

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to luckyBackup and Back In Time)
File Sharing And Backup
44 44%
56% 56
File Sharing
47 47%
53% 53
Backup & Sync
100 100%
0% 0
Backup & Restore
26 26%
74% 74

User comments

Share your experience with using luckyBackup and Back In Time. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare luckyBackup and Back In Time

luckyBackup Reviews

Top 5 System Backup Tools for the Linux Desktop (Updated 2020)
There are indeed many Rsync front-end applications for Linux that attempt to make things “easier.” Still, LuckyBackup manages to stand out by offering up a simple user interface and dozens of settings and options.
Source: zcom.tech

Back In Time Reviews

Linux File Backup - 5 Best Softeware for Linux Desktop and Server
As the name indicates, Back in Time(secured URL: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime) lets you transfer directory, system, and file data back in time. Just like Timeshift, it captures the snapshots and records in the directory as a backup. Though the tool is written in Python3 and QT, it saves your backups in simple text.
Source: www.easeus.com
The Top 17 Free and Open Source Backup Solutions
Back In Time is backup software designed for Linux, inspired by “flyback project”. The solution offers a command line client as well as a GUI, both written in Python. In order to perform backups, users specify where to store snapshots, what folders to back up, and the frequency of the backups. In addition to this, the solution is licensed with GPLv2.
Top 5 System Backup Tools for the Linux Desktop (Updated 2020)
Back In Time is a backup tool for the Linux desktop that creates system snapshots of specific directories that the user sets in the settings. By doing this, it allows users to keep a custom backup system that is more tailored to their needs, rather than a large backup filled with things they do not want.
Source: zcom.tech
11 Best Linux Backup Solutions
Back In Time is a simple and easy to use backup tool for the Linux operating system and works by taking snapshots of predefined directories. It comes with a very simple but useful user interface. You can configure specific directories for automatic backups or backup manually.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Back In Time seems to be a lot more popular than luckyBackup. While we know about 24 links to Back In Time, we've tracked only 1 mention of luckyBackup. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

luckyBackup mentions (1)

  • Krusader giving an Errno 13 during a large copy.
    Everything I'd read previously seemed to suggest Krusader or Midnight Commander was the way to go but it looks like Rsync should do the trick (I'm new to Linux / Unraid). I'll plan on trying the steps outlined by Space Invader here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkp_BUgJGqE I assume http://luckybackup.sourceforge.net/ is a good UI alternative if I wanted to do more in depth file manipulation / copies without... Source: almost 4 years ago

Back In Time mentions (24)

  • Opportunity for beginners: Some code cleaning in "Back In Time"
    It is often asked by beginners how and where starting to contribute. As member of the maintenance team of Back In Time (Backup software using rsync in the back, written with Python and Qt) I would like to introduce one of our "good first issues" (#1578). Source: over 1 year ago
  • Free software project "Back In Time" requests for translation
    I'm member of the upstream maintenance team of Back In Time a rsync-based backup software. No one gets payed. No company behind hit. Even the maintainers and developers are volunteers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Why is contributing soo hard
    Back In Time is a round about 15 years old backup software using rsync in the back. I'm part of the 3rd generation maintenance team there. A lot of work in investigating and fixing issues, understanding, documenting and refactoring old code. Source: over 1 year ago
  • [English -> Portuguese EU / Brazil] Text about attracting translators to a FOSS project
    This request is related to an Open Source project named Back In Time. Everyone there works voluntarily and unpaid. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is it normal practice in Github for a valid issue to be closed if the Dev can't work on it at the moment?
    In my own project we do it more transparent. We close if there is a good reason for it. We don't close just because no one is working on something. If there are no resources to work in it now but it seems important we keep it open until it is fixed. We do use milestones and priority labels to give the users an idea about our plans. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing luckyBackup and Back In Time, you can also consider the following products

CopyQueue - CopyQueue - Copying under control.

Duplicati - Free backup software to store backups online with strong encryption. Works with FTP, SSH, WebDAV, OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive and many others.

Digionica SyncTool - Digionica SyncTool is a useful utility that has been designed for synchronizing files and folders in numerous computers on the net, on local storage, and on servers.

rsync - rsync is a file transfer program for Unix systems. rsync uses the "rsync algorithm" which provides a very fast method for bringing remote files into sync.

csync - csync is a lightweight utility to synchronize files between two directories on a system or between...

Déjà Dup - Déjà Dup is a simple backup tool.