ltrace VS Profiling Viewer

Compare ltrace VS Profiling Viewer and see what are their differences

Netumo

Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

ltrace

ltrace intercepts and records dynamic library calls which are called by an executed process and the...

Profiling Viewer

Profiling Viewer for Mac OS X opens and visualizes callgrind files

Landing page //
2021-08-01

Landing page //
2021-09-28

ltrace

Website: ltrace.org

Edit details

Profiling Viewer

Website: profilingviewer.com

Edit details

ltrace features and specs

Function Call Tracing
ltrace can intercept and record calls to dynamically linked library functions that are made by a program. This is useful for debugging and understanding program behavior.
Dynamic Library Tracking
It focuses on tracing the use of library functions, which helps developers identify issues in the external libraries used by their applications.
Compatibility
ltrace works on most Unix-like operating systems and supports a variety of application types, making it versatile for different environments.

Possible disadvantages of ltrace

Limited to Dynamic Libraries
ltrace only traces dynamic library calls; it does not trace system calls or static library functions, limiting its scope in certain debugging scenarios.
Performance Overhead
Running an application under ltrace can introduce performance overhead, which might affect the timing and behavior of the application being analyzed.
Complexity in Analysis
The output of ltrace can be extensive and detailed, making it challenging to analyze and interpret without a good understanding of the program's libraries.