Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

lstore.graphic VS autoComplete.js

Compare lstore.graphic VS autoComplete.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

lstore.graphic logo lstore.graphic

Mockup Scene Creator

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.
  • lstore.graphic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12

lstore.graphic features and specs

  • High-Quality Assets
    Lstore.graphic provides a vast collection of high-quality design assets, including UI kits, mockups, icons, and illustrations. These resources are created by professional designers to ensure they meet industry standards.
  • Variety of Resources
    The platform offers a diverse range of design resources that cater to different needs such as web design, app interfaces, presentations, and branding materials. This variety helps designers find the exact resource they need without searching multiple sites.
  • Ease of Use
    The website is user-friendly with an intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to browse, search, and download assets. This convenience saves time and improves productivity.
  • Regular Updates
    Lstore.graphic frequently updates its library with new and trending design assets, ensuring that users have access to the latest design trends and tools.
  • Commercial Use License
    Many assets on Lstore.graphic come with a commercial use license, allowing designers to use the resources in client projects without worrying about legal implications.

Possible disadvantages of lstore.graphic

  • Paid Membership
    While some assets are available for free, many high-quality assets require a paid membership. This can be a barrier for designers who are looking for budget-friendly options.
  • Limited Free Assets
    The selection of free assets is relatively limited compared to the paid offerings. Users seeking comprehensive resources may find the free options insufficient for their needs.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Lstore.graphic being an online platform means that users need a stable internet connection to access and download assets. This may be problematic in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Search Limitations
    While the platform offers a search feature, it may not always yield precise results, causing users to spend extra time filtering through assets to find what they need.
  • No Customization
    The assets provided are pre-designed with limited options for customization directly on the platform. Designers might need additional tools and software to tailor the assets to their specific requirements.

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lstore.graphic and autoComplete.js)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
71 71%
29% 29
Prototyping
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using lstore.graphic and autoComplete.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lstore.graphic and autoComplete.js, you can also consider the following products

Invision - Prototyping and collaboration for design teams

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

Mockuuups Studio - Fast and easy way to create product mockups on macOS, Windows and Linux.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

Angle 2 Mockups - A giant Sketch Library for creating app presentations

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel