Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

locust VS Neustar Website Load Testing

Compare locust VS Neustar Website Load Testing and see what are their differences

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.

Neustar Website Load Testing logo Neustar Website Load Testing

Neustar Website Load Testing, formerly BrowserMob, uses advanced cloud technology and has a variety...
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • Neustar Website Load Testing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-04

locust features and specs

  • Scalability
    Locust is designed to distribute the load tests across multiple machines, allowing for high scalability and the ability to simulate millions of users.
  • Python-based
    The tool is written in Python, which makes it highly flexible and suitable for those who are familiar with the language. You can write custom test scenarios easily.
  • Web-based UI
    Locust provides a user-friendly web-based interface that makes it easy to monitor and control the test execution in real-time.
  • Real-time monitoring
    During test execution, you get real-time statistics and charts that help in monitoring the performance and load.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source tool, Locust allows for community contributions and is free to use, which helps in continuous improvement and support from the user base.

Possible disadvantages of locust

  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup can be somewhat complex, especially for large scale or distributed tests. Requires experience with Python and potentially other infrastructure setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Locust can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute resources, particularly when simulating large numbers of users.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Despite its flexibility, the requirement to write test scenarios in Python may present a learning curve for users not familiar with programming.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, Locust might not be suitable for load testing applications that use other protocols without additional customization.
  • Dependence on External Libraries
    While the use of Python offers flexibility, it also means that you might need to rely on external libraries and tools, which can introduce dependency management issues.

Neustar Website Load Testing features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analytics
    Neustar Website Load Testing offers detailed performance analytics, enabling users to identify bottlenecks and optimize website performance effectively.
  • Scalability
    The tool is capable of simulating high traffic volumes to test website scalability, making it suitable for websites expecting large numbers of visitors.
  • Real-world Simulation
    It provides realistic traffic simulations to better understand how websites will perform under real-world conditions, allowing for more accurate testing results.
  • User-friendly Interface
    Neustar offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies test configuration and analysis, allowing teams without extensive technical knowledge to set up and run tests.
  • Integrated with Neustar Security Solutions
    This service integrates seamlessly with other Neustar security solutions, offering enhanced protection and performance management.

Possible disadvantages of Neustar Website Load Testing

  • Cost
    The pricing for Neustar Website Load Testing might be on the higher side, making it less accessible for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Complex Setup for Advanced Features
    While the basic setup is user-friendly, configuring more advanced features might require specialized knowledge or training.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based service, its performance is reliant on the user's internet connectivity, which might affect testing reliability in environments with poor internet service.
  • Limited Free Trial
    Neustar may provide a limited free trial, which might not offer access to all features needed to comprehensively evaluate the product before purchasing.

locust videos

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

Neustar Website Load Testing videos

No Neustar Website Load Testing videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to locust and Neustar Website Load Testing)
Monitoring Tools
76 76%
24% 24
Website Testing
77 77%
23% 23
Analytics
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using locust and Neustar Website Load Testing. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

locust mentions (61)

  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
    Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Five Advanced Techniques to Improve Automated Testing by 50%
    You should also incorporate performance testing into your daily builds to catch performance regressions early. For this, you can use Locust for load testing. You can also implement performance budgets in your CI/CD pipeline. This will allow you to fail builds that don't meet performance criteria, ensuring performance doesn't degrade over time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Why your FastAPI (or Flask) App performs poorly with high loads
    These tests were done on GCP Cloud Run using a single processor, and 512M RAM machine, and we used Locust, an incredible tool (for Python, LoL). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How MySQL Tuning Can Dramatically Improve WordPress Performance
    Our test duration was 2 days. To handle this longer testing period, we switched from BlazeMeter (max test duration of 20 minutes) to Locust, an open-source load-testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Neustar Website Load Testing mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Neustar Website Load Testing yet. Tracking of Neustar Website Load Testing recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing locust and Neustar Website Load Testing, you can also consider the following products

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

LoadUIWeb - LoadUIWeb is a free desktop tool for performance, stress, scalability and load testing of web...

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

LoadForge - Better, cheaper load testing for websites, APIs and servers

gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.