Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

localhost.run VS Node.js on App Engine

Compare localhost.run VS Node.js on App Engine and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!

Node.js on App Engine logo Node.js on App Engine

Fully managed Node.js serverless application platform
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Node.js on App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-20

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Node.js on App Engine features and specs

  • Scalability
    App Engine provides automatic scaling, which means your Node.js application can handle increased traffic by scaling up and scales down when the traffic decreases.
  • Fully Managed
    App Engine manages the infrastructure for you, including server configuration and management, allowing developers to focus on code rather than infrastructure.
  • Integrated Google Cloud Services
    Node.js on App Engine can easily integrate with other Google Cloud services like Cloud Datastore, Cloud SQL, and more, fostering rich and scalable application development.
  • Built-in Security Features
    App Engine provides built-in security features to protect your Node.js application including Identity and Access Management (IAM) and integration with Google’s security infrastructure.
  • Cost Efficiency
    The pay-per-use model ensures that you only pay for what you use, which can be cost-effective for applications with variable workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Node.js on App Engine

  • Cold Start Latency
    Like many serverless environments, Node.js applications on App Engine might experience latency due to cold starts, especially after periods of inactivity.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Deploying on App Engine might lead to a certain level of dependency on Google Cloud’s ecosystem, making it challenging to migrate to another cloud provider without significant changes.
  • Limited Customization
    Being a fully managed service, there are limits to how much you can customize the runtime environment compared to traditional server instances.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Understanding App Engine's pricing model can be complex, which could make cost estimation difficult, particularly without a clear forecast of usage patterns.
  • Resource Constraints
    Given that App Engine standard environment has specific resource constraints and quotas, this might not be suitable for applications with high memory or CPU demands.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localhost.run and Node.js on App Engine)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using localhost.run and Node.js on App Engine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare localhost.run and Node.js on App Engine

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Node.js on App Engine Reviews

We have no reviews of Node.js on App Engine yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

Node.js on App Engine mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Node.js on App Engine yet. Tracking of Node.js on App Engine recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing localhost.run and Node.js on App Engine, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Serverless - Toolkit for building serverless applications

LocalXpose - Bye Bye Localhost, Hello World!

ZoomAdmin - Platform for managing cloud servers and apps